Cold Atoms for Gravity Probes

This is nearly a month old, now, because I keep saying “Oh, Idon’t have time to do this justice– I’ll write about it tomorrow.” I really need to stop doing that.

Anyway, Physics News Update has a story about a scheme to measure gravity using Bloch oscillations, based on a paper in Physical Review Letters. This is especially interesting to me, because the most important paper of my career made use of Bloch oscillations to get our experimental signal.

A quick explanation below the fold:

Bloch oscillations are a weird phenomenon you encounter in condensed matter physics. The easiest way to understand it is in terms of Bragg scattering, which is the reflection of light off periodic structures. Bragg scattering works because light that is reflected off the front of a crystal can interfere with light reflected off the second row of atoms in, and the third, and the fourth, and so on. If the wavelength of the light is comparable to the spacing between planes of atoms, there will be some angle at which these beams will all interfere constructively. This is the basis of X-ray crystallography– by looking at the patterns that result when x-rays of known wavelength scatter off a crystal, you can say something about how the atoms in that crystal are arranged.

Bloch oscillations happen when you put material particles into a periodic structure, and apply a potential shift to cause those particles to move through the structure. The classic example is electrons in a periodic crystal being accelerated by an applied voltage. The applied voltage causes the electrons to accelerate in some direction, and because electrons behave like waves according to the de Broglie relation, as they accelerate, their wavelength gets shorter and shorter. Until it’s exactly equal to the spacing between atoms in the crystal, at which point the electrons Bragg diffract off the crystal, and instantaneously reverse their direction. They travel in the other direction for a while, and then reverse direction again, and the process repeats. Rather than moving smoothly through the crystal, they oscillate back and forth in a very regular way.

This works for neutral atoms held in a periodic optical potential made by a standing wave of light. The effect was first demonstrated by my postdoctoral research group (before I got there), and we used to use it to make a cleaner-looking signal in our BEC experiments. The current paper has refined this technique (and made a big gain by switching atoms, one of the rare cases of improving a cold-atoms experiment by not using rubidium) so that they can follow these oscillations over a period of several seconds, which is just amazing, as the period of oscillation is a couple of milliseconds.

In the neutral-atom system, the potential shift that causes the atoms to start accelerating and eventually Bragg diffract is gravity. The atoms are held in a vertical standing wave, and atoms that are higher up want to fall under the influence of gravity. The frequency of the oscillation is given by a very simple formula, and only depends on the mass of the atoms, the wavelength of the laser, and the acceleration due to gravity. The mass is known and the laser wavelength can be controlled, so measuring the oscillation frequency amounts to measuring the acceleration due to gravity, and if you can measure several thousand oscillations, you can really nail the frequency.

Their measurements are at least potentially sensitive enough to detect changes in the strength of gravity due to massive objects brought close to the atoms. This might allow measurements of the force of gravity on the micron scale, which is one of the few experiments with a realistic chance of testing the existence of extra dimensions. If it works, it would have the added bonus of completely different systematics than the torsion pendulum experiments at UW, which would be very cool.

Anyway, it’s a nifty experiment, and shows yet again that cold atoms are where it’s at…

3 comments

  1. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0508572
    10 nm diameter is where it gets interesting – nice for the BEC Bloch oscillation experiment.

    The EotWash group for all its extraordinary reductions to practice is rather lame in test mass engineering. Drilled copper plates are inferior small sparation gravitation tests. Required is an extreme density homogeneous hard metal that is electromachined then polished flat and smooth. Copper has density 8.92 g/cm^3, platinum has density 21.09 g/cm^3. Interesting 95% Pt systems are Pt/Ga/In/Cu Kretchmer and Niessing SK and HTA (Eastern Smelting) alloys; 700 C for 30 minutes and slow cool to harden or 1000 C and water quench to soften,

    Vickers Hardness 318/Rockwell A 76/Rockwell C 32
    125,000 psi tensile
    104,000 psi yield

    Elsewhere in EotWash… 420+ years of Equivalence Principle testing are perfect nulls within experimental error. The only EP test (pdf) with an allowed substantial net signal (Einstein-Cartan exchange of spin and orbital angular momenta; teleparallel gravitation) is denied by EotWash. Adelberger et al. cannot comprehend that 3D atomic lattice mass distributions can be chiral within an achiral macroscopic object. The telling EP test masses are opposed single crystal solid spheres of space group P3(1)21 (right-handed screw axes) and P3(2)1 (left-handed screw axes) quartz. There can be no classical net signal output whatsover for any reason except an EP parity violation. Somebody should look.

  2. I just had to pipe up with a comment that you took what appears to be a quite complicated experiment, here, and explained it so clearly that this layman (at least) didn’t get lost even once through the description, and even grasped why it was an important result. This is the kind of stunt that would keep me reading UP even if I didn’t know you from Adam, Chad. Thanks.

  3. you took what appears to be a quite complicated experiment, here, and explained it so clearly that this layman (at least) didn’t get lost even once through the description, and even grasped why it was an important result.
    Seconded. Watch out – if you keept his up, some of us will start asking for a collection in book form to give to friends, and then how will you find time to actually keep doing physics?

Comments are closed.