I’ll have something more serious to say on this subject tomorrow (I want to sleep on it, and take another look at the post in the morning), but I have one quick comment on the New York Times review of Leonard Susskind’s The Cosmic Landscape:
Susskind’s insider perspective also lends an air of smugness to the whole affair. He falls prey to the common error of Whig history: interpreting past events as if they were inevitable stepping stones to the present. He allows remarkably little doubt about string theory considering that it has, as yet, not a whit of observational support. “As much as I would very much like to balance things by explaining the opposing side, I simply can’t find that other side,” he writes in his concluding chapter.
Now, granted, I haven’t read the book, and this is just one quote pulled out of context for the purposes of a slightly snarky book review. But then, I’m having a hard time imagining a context you could put Susskind’s quote into and not have it sound breathtakingly asinine.
Suggestions are welcome in the comments.
How about Evo v Creat/ID ? at least as instances of science.