{"id":9587,"date":"2014-09-17T13:35:01","date_gmt":"2014-09-17T17:35:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/?p=9587"},"modified":"2014-09-17T13:35:01","modified_gmt":"2014-09-17T17:35:01","slug":"bad-graphics-stem-diversity-edition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2014\/09\/17\/bad-graphics-stem-diversity-edition\/","title":{"rendered":"Bad Graphics, STEM Diversity Edition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There was a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/diversity-in-science-where-are-the-data\/\">article in Scientific American about diversity in STEM<\/a> collecting together the best demographic data available about the science and engineering workforce. It&#8217;s a useful collection of references, and comes with some very pretty graphics, particularly this one, showing the demographic breakdown of the US population compared to the science and engineering fields:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_9589\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-9589\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/files\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_original.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/files\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_original.jpg\" alt=\"Demographic breakdown of general population vs. science and engineering, from the Scientific American post.\" width=\"600\" height=\"600\" class=\"size-full wp-image-9589\" srcset=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_original.jpg 600w, http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_original-150x150.jpg 150w, http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_original-300x300.jpg 300w, http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_original-100x100.jpg 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-9589\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Demographic breakdown of general population vs. science and engineering, from the Scientific American post.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>This is a very professionally made graphic, but also misleading in the worst way. When I first looked at this, I thought &#8220;Huh. It&#8217;s actually much less bad than I thought&#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is, of course, an illusion, caused by the fact that the colored bars aren&#8217;t actually proportional to the percentages they represent. The &#8220;White Male&#8221; bar in particular is supposed to represent 51% of the workforce stack, but is only about 35% of the top-to-bottom pixel count.<\/p>\n<p>I understand why they did this&#8211; if you size everything in correct proportion, the smaller ethnic groups are basically invisible&#8211; but it has the effect of undermining the point they&#8217;re after. If you want to really see what the situation looks like, the correctly proportioned stacked bar graph is in the &#8220;featured image&#8221; above, and I&#8217;ll reproduce it here for the RSS reader crowd:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_9588\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-9588\" style=\"width: 600px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/files\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_better.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/files\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_better.jpg\" alt=\"Demographic breakdown of general population vs. science and engineering, redone to correct proportions.\" width=\"600\" height=\"389\" class=\"size-full wp-image-9588\" srcset=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_better.jpg 600w, http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/STEM_diversity_better-300x195.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-9588\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Demographic breakdown of general population vs. science and engineering, redone to correct proportions.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>(General population is on the left, STEM workers on the right; converting from SigmaPlot to .jpg ate the labels, which I didn&#8217;t notice right away, and don&#8217;t want to take time to fix&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>This makes the usual point a little more dramatically: white males and Asians are dramatically overrepresented relative to the population of the US as a whole, at the expense of blacks and Hispanics. <\/p>\n<p>Anyway, this is a minor quibble, but given my initial surprised reaction, I thought it was worth a quick post. On the whole, it&#8217;s a useful article, and not a <a href=\"http:\/\/news.sciencemag.org\/scientific-community\/2014\/09\/top-50-science-stars-twitter\">shameless and stupid bit of clickbait<\/a>, so good for Scientific American.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There was a article in Scientific American about diversity in STEM collecting together the best demographic data available about the science and engineering workforce. It&#8217;s a useful collection of references, and comes with some very pretty graphics, particularly this one, showing the demographic breakdown of the US population compared to the science and engineering fields:&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2014\/09\/17\/bad-graphics-stem-diversity-edition\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Bad Graphics, STEM Diversity Edition<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":9588,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,144,147,42,28,11,75],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-academia","category-data_presentation","category-playing-with-graphs","category-policy","category-politics","category-science","category-society","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9587\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9588"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}