{"id":9191,"date":"2014-03-07T10:42:32","date_gmt":"2014-03-07T15:42:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/?p=9191"},"modified":"2014-03-07T10:42:32","modified_gmt":"2014-03-07T15:42:32","slug":"idle-physics-query-whistling-bombs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2014\/03\/07\/idle-physics-query-whistling-bombs\/","title":{"rendered":"Idle Physics Query: Whistling Bombs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Not that long ago, SteelyKid was doing something violent with toys (she&#8217;s very tough, as you can see from the featured image above), and in the process made the<a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=8PbD3I9eumM\"> canonical falling-bomb whistle<\/a> noise. And it occurred to me to wonder, why that sound?<\/p>\n<p>I mean, I&#8217;ve seen footage of falling bombs and the canonical sound seems like an accurate enough. But I&#8217;m not sure I understand it from a physics perspective. Specifically, when you do the falling-bomb whistle, you do a whistle that decreases in pitch. But the bomb is falling faster as it approaches the ground, so if anything, I would expect the pitch to go up&#8211; if the sound is made by some sort of turbulence effect, you would guess that the frequency should increase as the speed goes up. (If it&#8217;s a deliberate effect from some sort of whistling thing, on the other hand, the pitch might be fairly constant.)<\/p>\n<p>So, why is that? Is it a Doppler effect thing? (As you know, even if your name&#8217;s not Bob, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Doppler_effect\">the Doppler effect<\/a> is a phenomenon involving waves from a moving source, that shifts the frequency an observer detects  up when the source and observer are moving together, and down when they&#8217;re moving apart. This is why a police siren sounds higher in pitch as it comes toward you, and lower as it goes away.)<\/p>\n<p>Well, if you dropped a bomb from a height of 1000m (just to have round numbers), the speed when it hit the ground in the absence of air resistance would be a bit less than half the speed of sound, which would give a comparable decrease in the frequency heard by the pilot of the plane that dropped the bomb (the Doppler shift of a sound at a given frequency is equal to the frequency at the source multiplied by the speed of the source divided by the speed of sound). Obviously, a real bomb would experience air resistance (it couldn&#8217;t make sound otherwise), so the actual shift would be less, and would eventually reach a constant pitch as the bomb reached terminal velocity. This gives a back-of-the-envelope (well, margin-of-the-class-notebook, because that&#8217;s where I actually did it) sense of the scale of the Doppler effect you could expect, and is basically consistent with the canonical whistle sound.<\/p>\n<p>But if it&#8217;s a Doppler thing, the change in pitch should depend on the frame of reference. That is, the people in the plane would hear it go down, but people on the ground would hear it go up. But nobody ever does the falling-bomb noise in the reverse direction.  And I have no personal war-zone experience to draw on, here&#8211; maybe I should ask my Senior Middle East Correspondent, who came under mortar fire in Libya a while back&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>I suppose the always-decrease-in-pitch thing could just be psychology&#8211; if you&#8217;re playing war, it&#8217;s much more comfortable to put yourself in the position of the person dropping the bombs than the person being bombed. <\/p>\n<p>On thinking about it a bit, though, you might be able to get a decrease in pitch from a falling bomb by being off to the side, because the velocity that matters is the velocity along the line of sight. So, if you were standing 1km away from a bomb falling from a 1km height, the initial downward velocity could be broken down into components that are toward you, and perpendicular to you, as shown in the figure&#8211; the red arrow is along the line-of sight, the orange perpendicular to it. Each component would be 70% of the initial speed, so that would give an upward Doppler shift of 70% of the maximum, as the Doppler shift is due only to the line-of-sight component. <\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_9198\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-9198\" style=\"width: 550px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/files\/2014\/03\/bomb_diagram.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/files\/2014\/03\/bomb_diagram.png\" alt=\"Diagram of a falling bomb, showing the components of velocity.\" width=\"550\" height=\"412\" class=\"size-full wp-image-9198\" srcset=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/bomb_diagram.png 550w, http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/bomb_diagram-300x225.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-9198\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Diagram of a falling bomb, showing the components of velocity.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Just before the bomb hits, though, the velocity would be nearly perpendicular to the line of sight, so the Doppler shift would be zero (to first order). Which would be a <em>decrease<\/em> in pitch from the starting condition. So maybe somebody on the ground would hear a decreasing pitch after all, at least provided they&#8217;re a fair distance from the impact point. <\/p>\n<p>Of course, if the bomb was released from rest, it would be speeding up, and the increasing shift from that might be bigger than the angle effect. But once the bomb reached its terminal velocity, the angle effect would give you a reduction in frequency, in the same way that you get the characteristic &#8220;eeeeeeee-owwwwwww&#8221; effect as a fast car goes by&#8211; the Doppler shift moves the frequency up as it comes toward you, is zero just as it passes, and then shifts the frequency down as it recedes.<\/p>\n<p>Which of these effects would win out is difficult to say. This, of course, demands some sort of VPython simulation, but I have too much other stuff to do this morning&#8211; I&#8217;ve already spent an order of magnitude more time on this post than I intended to&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>And, of course (to head off an inevitable comment) I&#8217;m sure this is Google-able, but I offer it here as an example of the thought processes of a physicist confronted with an anomalous result. And also an example of the weird stuff that distracts me when I&#8217;m playing with the kids&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Not that long ago, SteelyKid was doing something violent with toys (she&#8217;s very tough, as you can see from the featured image above), and in the process made the canonical falling-bomb whistle noise. And it occurred to me to wonder, why that sound? I mean, I&#8217;ve seen footage of falling bombs and the canonical sound&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2014\/03\/07\/idle-physics-query-whistling-bombs\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Idle Physics Query: Whistling Bombs<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":9192,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[663,2,7,37,11,3,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9191","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-everyday","category-personal","category-physics","category-pop_culture","category-science","category-steelykid","category-the_pip","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9191","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9191"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9191\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9192"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9191"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}