{"id":8541,"date":"2013-09-13T10:27:00","date_gmt":"2013-09-13T14:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/?p=8541"},"modified":"2013-09-13T10:27:00","modified_gmt":"2013-09-13T14:27:00","slug":"on-the-interconnectedness-of-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2013\/09\/13\/on-the-interconnectedness-of-science\/","title":{"rendered":"On the Interconnectedness of Science"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve finished a first pass through all the regular chapters of the book-in-progress (in addition to those in <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2013\/05\/31\/how-to-think-like-a-scientist-taking-stock\/\">in this progress report<\/a>, there&#8217;s one more in Section 1 about antiques, and three more in Section 4, two about statistics and one about teamwork). I&#8217;m starting to do section-level proofreading, looking at blocks of chapters together.<\/p>\n<p>This isn&#8217;t a step I had to go through with my previous books, for several reasons. One is just that the smaller set of responsibilities I had then made it easier to find contiguous blocks of writing time&#8211; SteelyKid was born after book 1, and The Pip after book two, and I wasn&#8217;t department chair, either. The writing of this one has been much more fragmented, mostly plugging away in three-hour chunks a couple of days a week. I hardly remember what&#8217;s in some of the chapters I wrote back at the beginning of this process.<\/p>\n<p>More than that, though, these chapters turn out to be surprisingly interconnected. I say &#8220;surprisingly&#8221; because the earlier books were inherently cumulative&#8211; stuff in the later chapters depended on having read material in the earlier chapters&#8211; and I had frequent callbacks to earlier sections. More than that, though, this was conceived as a set of independent chapters, each telling a self-contained story about one particular aspect of scientific thinking. That&#8217;s the whole reason I thought I&#8217;d be able to write it in three-hour chunks two days a week, after all.<\/p>\n<p>It turns out, though, that these chapters are way more interconnected than I realized going in. In fact, I suspect I may have even more &#8220;as we saw in Chapter XXX&#8221; notes here than in the previous two books. It&#8217;s really next to impossible to separate these different stories completely, and lots of common elements recur. Some of these are technical&#8211; I think I define &#8220;cosmic rays&#8221; in at least three different places&#8211; while others are procedural. There are all sorts of quirky little aspects to the historical stories I&#8217;m telling that echo back and forth between stories. And that&#8217;s just the stuff I noticed while writing it in disconnected bursts&#8211; by the time I get done going over bigger blocks, this may be the most densely cross-reference thing I&#8217;ve written.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s a little ironic that writing a book that&#8217;s organized around discrete steps in the scientific process has given me a greater sense of science as a holistic thing. I&#8217;m not going to be becoming a squishy humanist any time soon, insisting on the irreducible complexity of everything as a way to avoid ever answering a question about anything, but it&#8217;s been an interesting experience.<\/p>\n<p><i>(I&#8217;m sure that my wibbling about the writing process is utterly fascinating, but I&#8217;ve already plowed through a second draft of a TED audition talk and a full set of chapter revisions this morning, so I don&#8217;t have brain left for anything more compelling&#8230;)<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve finished a first pass through all the regular chapters of the book-in-progress (in addition to those in in this progress report, there&#8217;s one more in Section 1 about antiques, and three more in Section 4, two about statistics and one about teamwork). I&#8217;m starting to do section-level proofreading, looking at blocks of chapters together.&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2013\/09\/13\/on-the-interconnectedness-of-science\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">On the Interconnectedness of Science<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[67,7,68,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-book_writing","category-physics","category-progress_report","category-science","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8541","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8541"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8541\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8541"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}