![\"Sea](\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/files\/2013\/07\/turtle.jpg\")
<\/a>(from this photography guide site<\/a> which includes some other awesome examples). So, why do you get this effect?<\/p>\n The key physics here is the idea of refraction<\/em>, which has to do with the propagation of light through matter. You can talk about this in a particle-like picture<\/a>, if you want, but it’s usually described in terms of waves: light waves entering a material slow down slightly due to their interaction with the material, and as a result, their wavelength gets slightly shorter (you can think of it, loosely, as a given wave “catching up” to the wave in front of it as they hit the boundary). A light wave passing from vacuum into glass sees a reduction in speed to about 2\/3rds of the speed of light in vacuum, and the wavelength gets shorter by a corresponding amount– orangey-red light at 600nm would have a wavelength of around 400nm, like that of violet light in vacuum. This is quantified by a number called the “index of refraction,” which is a number greater than 1 for ordinary materials; around 1.5 in the case of glass, about 1.3 in the case of water.<\/p>\n That’s all that happens if the light hits the surface head-on, but if it strikes at an angle, there’s more to it: the light bends as it enters the medium. This produces some cool optical effects, like this photo I took yesterday of a pencil in a thematically appropriate water bottle:<\/p>\n When you look at the picture, there seems to be a discontinuity in the pencil right at the surface of the water. That’s because the light rays from the pencil follow a slightly different path through the water than through the air, due to refraction. The physics of this is governed by an equation called “Snells Law” after some historical dude who apparently also invented the jagged little thing on fish hooks<\/a>. Or something. You might want to check Wikipedia.<\/p>\n Snell’s Law has a very simple mathematical form that I will crib from Hyperphysics<\/a>, which also has a little calculator on that page if you want to play with it:<\/p>\n The cartoon on the right in that figure shows what happens to a light ray moving from left to right as it enters a material at an angle. If you look at the angle between the light ray and a line perpendicular to the surface, you see that it gets smaller as you cross the boundary; you can determine exactly how much smaller from the formula on the left of that picture. This bending is useful for all kinds of things, chiefly the making of things like lenses for telescopes of vision correction– were it not for Snell’s Law, I wouldn’t be able to write this, because when I don’t have my contact lenses in, anything more than about six inches from my face is too blurry to read.<\/p>\n What’s a little harder to see because I cropped the picture a bit is that the opposite happens on the far side of the medium. You can get the idea by just reversing the direction at the first boundary, though: the ray comes in, and as it crosses from, say, glass to air, the angle gets bigger rather than smaller. Again, you can find the exact angles from the formula.<\/p>\n Now, if you think carefully about this, you can see that something weird will happen at some point. For a given combination of materials, as you go from the slow medium to the fast medium, there will be some incoming angle smaller than 90 degrees for which the outgoing angle is exactly 90 degrees– that is, it goes right along the surface, rather than passing through into the air. This is called the “critical angle” for the material. Beyond that angle, you get a phenomenon called “total internal reflection”– light striking the surface will bounce off, rather than pass through. There’s another nice figure from hyperphysics<\/a> showing all of this in a kind of busy manner:<\/p>\n But there’s not really a need to rely on cartoons and equations for this: it’s easy enough to get a picture of, provided you have a camera on a tripod and a laser pointer. Here’s an example of total internal reflection at the side of the water bottle:<\/p>\n (I added a drop of milk to the water to make the laser show up more clearly, thanks to Rayleigh scattering.) You can see that the laser follows a straight line through the water, but when it hits the edge of the bottle, it doesn’t go through, but bounces off. This also happens at the boundary between water and air, as seen in the featured image up top, which I’ll reproduce here to save you scrolling:<\/p>\n (This should also serve as some reassurance that I didn’t secretly put a mirror surface on the side of the bottle to fake the previous picture…) Beyond a certain critical angle, all of the light reflects off the boundary, like a perfect mirror.<\/p>\n This is the physics behind the “shininess” of the bottom of the water surface in your pool, and awesome pictures like that turtle up above. Light from the sun passes through the water from the air side, and reflects off underwater objects. Some of the light rays headed back out of the water, though, will hit the surface at an angle greater than the critical angle, and undergo total internal reflection, making the water surface act like a perfect mirror and producing clear images for a smooth surface, or a general silvery smear if there are a lot of waves. Because of this, even water that’s very clear when looked at from above is hard to see out<\/em> of, to the great relief of sport fishermen everywhere.<\/p>\n ————-<\/p>\n So, what was the stupid advice for which I am atoning? Well, the student in question is looking at Rayleigh scattering of light passing through water with small particles in it (like the milk that makes the laser visible in the pictures above). This should lead to some attenuation of the beam as it passes through a long column of water, as light gets scattered out to the side; we’re trying to measure this, with an eye toward making a cool upper-level lab out of it.<\/p>\n To this end, we have a long, narrow water tank that we’re shining laser pointers through. We had a question, though, about the absorption of the beam, and it would be nice to have a measurement of the attenuation of the beam through different lengths of water. With a single tank, though, we can’t really get that, but I had an allegedly brilliant idea: if we sent light through the tank at different angles, it would cross different thicknesses of water, giving us the data we wanted without needing to scrounge up a bunch of containers of various lengths.<\/p>\n While it’s true that this does give different lengths, of course, this was a very dumb idea on my part because of total internal reflection. Beyond a small range of angles, the light reaching the end of the tank just reflects, and as a result, there’s nothing to detect at the other side. So we can’t actually get the relevant data by that method, which was a waste of my student’s time that I should’ve known about had I remembered my freshman year physics classes. Thus, this post.<\/p>\n (To get the relevant data, I went to Bed, Bath, and Beyond and bought a $20 set of rectangular glass storage containers; combining them in different ways should give enough different lengths to get a sanity check measurement of the attenuation…)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The other day, I made a suggestion to one of my research students of an experiment to try. When I checked back a day later, she told me it hadn’t worked, and I immediately realized that what I had told her to do was very stupid. As penance, then, I’ll explain the underlying physics, which… Continue reading Reflecting, Totally; or Why the Pool Looks Shiny from Underwater<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8189,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[663,19,169,32,238,7,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-everyday","category-experiment","category-lasers","category-my_lab","category-optics","category-physics","category-science","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8186\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a>