{"id":8033,"date":"2013-06-18T11:33:00","date_gmt":"2013-06-18T15:33:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/?p=8033"},"modified":"2013-06-18T11:33:00","modified_gmt":"2013-06-18T15:33:00","slug":"quasi-poll-most-needed-pop-science-biography","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2013\/06\/18\/quasi-poll-most-needed-pop-science-biography\/","title":{"rendered":"Quasi Poll: Most Needed Pop-Science Biography?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve got a ton of stuff that needs to get done this week, but I don&#8217;t want the blog to be completely devoid of new content, so here&#8217;s a quasi-poll question for my wise and worldly readers:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>What scientist is most in need of a good popular biography?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>By &#8220;popular biography,&#8221; I mean things like Norton&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/books.wwnorton.com\/books\/book-template.aspx?ser=Great+Discoveries&#038;lastpage=4&#038;currentpage=1\">Great Discoveries<\/a> books, several of which Ive reviewed here, including <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2011\/05\/09\/quantum-man-by-lawrence-krauss\/\">Krauss on Feynman<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/07\/27\/a-force-of-nature-the-frontier\/\">Reeves on Rutherford<\/a>, two books that I keep coming back to for useful tidbits. These aren&#8217;t deep works of historical scholarship, and don&#8217;t necessarily attempt to be definitive, but focus on being accessible and readable.<\/p>\n<p>There are only a small number of these out there, though, and many important scientists don&#8217;t have this kind of bio yet. So, the question to be answered in comments is: who should get one of these sorts of books that doesn&#8217;t already have one?<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve been reading a lot of history of physics recently for the book-in-progress, specifically about the history of QED, and I think at this point, I&#8217;d probably vote for a Wolfgang Pauli biography. This may seem odd, as Pauli was a theorist&#8217;s theorist, who was so inept in the laboratory that some experimentalists once attributed a lab failure to the fact that Pauli was changing trains in their city at the time that their apparatus broke.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, though, the histories I&#8217;ve been reading put Pauli at or near the center of physics in the mid 20th Century&#8211; he contributed to all the major problems, and more importantly seems to have been a key communications nexus. Everybody working on quantum physics appears to have written to and gotten responses from Pauli. And he was pretty entertaining, in a witheringly sarcastic, quirky sort of way. The photo at the top, taken from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/nobel_prizes\/physics\/laureates\/2005\/glauber-bio.html\">Roy Glauber&#8217;s autobiography at the Nobel Prize website<\/a> is a pretty good indication: Pauli was kicking a soccer ball around, and when he saw Glauber about to take a photo of this, he turned and kicked the ball directly into the camera&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>So, I bet it&#8217;d be fun to read a good popular bio of Pauli. Somebody should get on writing one of those.<\/p>\n<p>Who&#8217;s your favorite scientist who ought to get a good popular biography?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve got a ton of stuff that needs to get done this week, but I don&#8217;t want the blog to be completely devoid of new content, so here&#8217;s a quasi-poll question for my wise and worldly readers: What scientist is most in need of a good popular biography? By &#8220;popular biography,&#8221; I mean things like&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2013\/06\/18\/quasi-poll-most-needed-pop-science-biography\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Quasi Poll: Most Needed Pop-Science Biography?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8034,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,80,7,51,37,11,52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-books","category-history_of_science","category-physics","category-physics_books","category-pop_culture","category-science","category-science_books","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8033"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8033\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8034"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}