{"id":8,"date":"2005-12-30T15:14:07","date_gmt":"2005-12-30T15:14:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2005\/12\/30\/pithhelmeted-anthropological-r\/"},"modified":"2005-12-30T15:14:07","modified_gmt":"2005-12-30T15:14:07","slug":"pithhelmeted-anthropological-r","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2005\/12\/30\/pithhelmeted-anthropological-r\/","title":{"rendered":"Pith-Helmeted Anthropological Reporting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>Scott Eric Kaufman of Acephalous is <A HREF=\"http:\/\/acephalous.typepad.com\/acephalous\/mla_2005\/index.html\">blogging the MLA<\/A>. (I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s not the only one, he&#8217;s just the only one I&#8217;m reading&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p><P>As I understand it, the Modern Language Association meeting is pretty much the be-all end-all of humanities meetings. It&#8217;s sort of fascinating to read about, coming off as sort of a cross between DAMOP and Worldcon (look, a <A HREF=\"http:\/\/acephalous.typepad.com\/acephalous\/2005\/12\/mla_book_browsi.html\">Dealer&#8217;s Room<\/A>! People <A HREF=\"http:\/\/insidehighered.com\/news\/2005\/12\/30\/pickup\">getting a little punchy<\/A>!).<\/p>\n<p><P>Of course, most of the things that make it fascinating to me are the areas where it diverges from my experience of professional meetings&#8211; the cattle-call interviewing and the people reading pre-written papers (sometimes <A HREF=\"http:\/\/acephalous.typepad.com\/acephalous\/2005\/12\/mla_i_cant_beli.html\">hilariously badly<\/A>). Those are both &#8220;What are you thinking?!?&#8221; concepts to me&#8211; while there are occasionally people doing interviews at physics meetings, there&#8217;s no one meeting comprehensive enough to make it mandatory (and there&#8217;s never likely to be one&#8211; the Centennial Meeting in Atlanta in 1999 was a zoo), and there&#8217;s a strong cultural bias against reading from a script for <A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.steelypips.org\/principles\/2002_07_14_principlearchive.php#85257187\">scientific talks<\/A>.<\/p>\n<p><P>It occurs to me that it would be sort of interesting to hear what humanities types think of the way scientific meetings are run. The few times it&#8217;s come up at happy hours or whatever, people I know in English seem just as horrified at the idea of a meeting full of off-the-cuff presentations as I do at the prospect of spending a whole week listening to people read from a script, and I&#8217;m sure there are lots of other aspects of a typical DAMOP that would be baffling to someone trained in another discipline.<\/p>\n<p><P>It&#8217;d be sort of interesting, in a we-need-to-fill-out-our-magazine sort of way, for somebody to send a scientist to the MLA, and an MLA type to a scientific meeting, and see what each of them has to say. At first glance, this might seem unfair to the humanist, but honestly, I get about as much out of Scott&#8217;s <A HREF=\"http:\/\/acephalous.typepad.com\/acephalous\/2005\/12\/contemporary_fi.html\">panel descriptions<\/A> as an English major would get from an invited talk at DAMOP&#8230; Of course, for all I know, this has already been done, and I just didn&#8217;t see it&#8211; I&#8217;d be shocked if I was the first person to think of it.<\/p>\n<p><P>(I didn&#8217;t take a laptop to last year&#8217;s meeting, but if you&#8217;re dying for a look inside a scientific meeting, there&#8217;s some <A HREF=\"http:\/\/lundblad.caltech.edu\/lundblog\/2005_05_01_archive.html#111631529171860091\">DAMOP-blogging at Lundblog<\/A>. I may or may not attempt to do something similar this year.)<\/p>\n<p><P>(This was originally posted <A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.steelypips.org\/principles\/2005_12_25_principlearchive.php#113594494351680137\">at my steelypips blog<\/A>, where there are some comments.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Scott Eric Kaufman of Acephalous is blogging the MLA. (I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s not the only one, he&#8217;s just the only one I&#8217;m reading&#8230;) As I understand it, the Modern Language Association meeting is pretty much the be-all end-all of humanities meetings. It&#8217;s sort of fascinating to read about, coming off as sort of a cross&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2005\/12\/30\/pithhelmeted-anthropological-r\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Pith-Helmeted Anthropological Reporting<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-two_cultures","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}