{"id":7219,"date":"2012-06-20T10:34:22","date_gmt":"2012-06-20T14:34:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/?p=7219"},"modified":"2012-06-20T10:34:22","modified_gmt":"2012-06-20T14:34:22","slug":"ten-years-before-the-blog-2008-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2012\/06\/20\/ten-years-before-the-blog-2008-2009\/","title":{"rendered":"Ten Years Before the Blog: 2008-2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In which the great blog recap rolls on to probably the most important event of the last ten years: the arrival of SteelyKid. And a bunch of other bloggy stuff.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s really no question what should be the featured image for this recap post: Clearly, it needs to be an early photo of SteelyKid, who <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/08\/07\/meet-steelykid\/\">arrived not quite four years ago<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/08\/13\/skybison-included-for-scale\/\">soon made friends with Appa the stuffed sky-bison<\/a>. Sadly, we haven&#8217;t been very good about doing regular pictures of The Pip, mostly because it&#8217;s so exhausting to keep up with the two of them.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, regular blogging continued as well. This seems to have been the rare year without some all-consuming kerfuffle, at least on my part&#8211; there were a couple of big things that went on in the background, but by this time I had largely decoupled from the more drama-prone parts of ScienceBlogs. Which, on the one hand, was a little sad, because it ceased to be a real blogging community, but was much better on the whole for my sanity. And my blogging, which had a better balance of stuff.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PHYSICS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I spent a lot of time during this year revising the manuscript of <a href=\"http:\/\/dogphysics.com\/book_info.html\"><cite>How to Teach Physics to Your Dog<\/cite><\/a>, so it&#8217;s not too surprising that there were a lot of conversations with the dog about physics. We talked about <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/07\/31\/physical-theories-squeak-when\/\">physical theories as dog toys<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/09\/24\/everything-is-relative-in-the\/\">general relativity<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/12\/09\/the-law-of-burger-attraction\/\">psuedo-quantum scams<\/a>, as well as some stuff that will turn up in a later section. I had forgotten the first and third of those, so it was fun to rediscover them.<\/p>\n<p>This was also a good year for writing things that I keep coming back to. We had <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/07\/26\/the-innumeracy-of-intellectual\/\">The Innumeracy of Intellectuals<\/a> (reprinted in Inside Higher Ed), <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/09\/15\/we-are-science\/\">We Are Science<\/a> (reprinted in some group&#8217;s newsletter), <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/25\/science-is-what-makes-us-human\/\">Science Is What Makes Us Human<\/a> (which plays a big part in the work-in-progress), <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/09\/algebra-is-like-sunscreen\/\">Algebra Is Like Sunscreen<\/a> (not actually famous, but I refer back to it from time to time), and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/21\/the-myth-of-the-abrasive-geniu\/\">The Myth of the Abrasive Genius<\/a> (which, again, I refer back to now and again). That&#8217;s a pretty good run of stuff. There was also a lot of stuff along similar lines to those, though not quite as memorable: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/08\/12\/peer-review-does-not-define-sc\/\">Peer Review Does Not Define Science<\/a> (in which I ally myself with Zombie Feynman), <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/10\/14\/innumeracy-on-parade\/\">Innumeracy on Parade<\/a> (why is the <cite>Washington Post<\/cite> so prone to publishing desperately stupid articles about math, anyway?), and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/25\/geniuses-dont-fail-out\/\">Geniuses Don&#8217;t Fail Out<\/a> (which might be a little too harsh, but I still think the &#8220;I&#8217;m just too smart for school&#8221; is more likely to be self-justification than reality). I also got to give a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/27\/graduation-speech-think-like-a\/\">graduation speech at my old high school<\/a>, twenty years after my own graduation, which was pretty cool.<\/p>\n<p>I also did a lot of straight-up physics writing. One of the things that I&#8217;m most proud of didn&#8217;t actually make it onto the list of top posts for the year, but I like it a lot even if nobody else does: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/10\/04\/the-metastable-xenon-project\/\">the Metastable Xenon Project<\/a>, in which I went through and wrote up in detail each of the six publications that came out of my Ph.D. thesis work, along with a &#8220;making of&#8221; post telling some of the stories behind the papers. This was probably my single favorite physics-y thing of the year.<\/p>\n<p>Also in physics content, there was a pair of posts about Many-Worlds (<a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/11\/19\/parallel-universes-and-moralit\/\">one<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/11\/20\/manyworlds-and-decoherence\/\">two<\/a> (which is where I started to get fed up with Neil Bates&#8230;), two posts about photons (<a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/11\/13\/whats-the-matter-with-photons\/\">one<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/02\/25\/photons-are-particles\/\">two<\/a>), <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/12\/08\/the-age-of-entanglement-by-lou\/\">a book I really liked<\/a>, a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/03\/06\/numbers-of-order-unity\/\">discussion of numbers and units<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/03\/18\/why-does-excel-suck-so-much\/\">a discussion of why Excel is woefully inadequate for scientific purposes<a>. <\/p>\n<p>There was, of course, pedagogical material, with posts on <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/26\/gatekeeping-vs-bad-teaching\/\">&#8220;gatekeeping&#8221;<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/28\/grading-methods-dont-matter\/\">grading methods<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/05\/08\/would-you-like-some-calculus-w\/\">math in the intro courses<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/16\/pros-and-cons-of-interactive-c\/\">some early worrying about active engagement methods<\/a>, which became a bigger obsession last fall. If I had to pick one post out of the pedagogical stuff to save, though, it would be <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/04\/27\/how-to-email-your-instructor-f\/\">How to Email Your Instructor for Help<\/a>, which I think ought to be distributed to incoming students at first-year orientation.<\/p>\n<p>I also had a bunch of sort of whimsical physics-type posts, looking at <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/05\/applying-physics-to-football\/\">ways to apply physics to improve football<\/a>, and applying physical models to <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/23\/the-limits-of-elven-vision\/\">great works of fantasy literature<\/a>, and to <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/05\/04\/the-faulty-thermodynamics-of-c\/\">bedtime<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/05\/07\/fairy-tale-physics-2-spinning\/\">stories<\/a>. Those are hard to do on a regular basis, but a good deal of fun when I think of them, and I&#8217;ve continued to do some of this sort of thing.<\/p>\n<p>Also, SteelyKid provided material for a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/08\/29\/babies-are-quantized\/\">silly physics post<\/a> of her own&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>POLITICS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>2008, if you remember, was a really bad year, economy-wise. This was the era of the great mortgage bubble crash, which I <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/10\/08\/the-kibble-bubble\/\">tried to explain to Emmy<\/a>. I also had a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/03\/24\/physics-can-fix-this\/\">modest proposal for fixing the financial industry<\/a> that I still think would have worked. Actually, it would probably still be an improvement, actually.<\/p>\n<p>In giant stupid blog kerfuffles, I again <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/07\/16\/an-ethical-dialogue\/\">turned to the dog for an oblique comment<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/23\/why-the-silent-majority-is-sil\/\">offered a resigned explanation of why I don&#8217;t write much about politics<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>2008 being an election year, I also had some posts about data presentation in political-ish contexts, having to do with <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/10\/28\/the-visual-display-of-politica\/\">tax plans<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/07\/10\/how-to-lie-with-incompetent-ph\/\">public transit promotions<\/a>. And that&#8217;s about it for notable politcal commentary.<\/p>\n<p><strong>POP CULTURE<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The highlight of the year, pop-culture wise, was the DonorsChoose fundraiser, for which I agreed to <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/11\/04\/dance-like-a-monkey\/\">dance like a monkey<\/a>. Everybody got a good laugh out of that.<\/p>\n<p>One of the most enduring posts of the year, weirdly, was <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/04\/27\/advantix-makes-dogs-ticklish\/\">this question about dog medication<\/a>, which continued to draw a trickle of new comments pretty much right up to the present. People have strong opinions about their flea and tick preventatives.<\/p>\n<p>I also wrote about <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/28\/how-not-to-break-into-publishi\/\">people saying dumb things about publishing<\/a>, a topic that keeps coming up these days<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/17\/if-its-not-boring-its-not-art\/\">the too-narrow definition of high culture<\/a>, which ties back to the innumeracy of intellectuals thing from the start of the post. There was also a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/03\/29\/tolkien-religion-and-the-death\/\">post about Tolkien<\/a> that almost belongs in the politics category, but not quite.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, there was the requisite sports content, with a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/09\/26\/baseball-statistics-are-crap\/\">rant about baseball<\/a>, a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/03\/18\/teams-who-are-ahead-win-more-f\/\">look at a stupid story about halftime scores<\/a>, and a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/05\/05\/malcolm-gladwell-is-no-charles\/\">post about the story that put me off Malcolm Gladwell for good<\/a>. Which is another thing I refer back to a lot, which is as good a way as any to end the recap of this year in blogging.<\/p>\n<p>Next up: the year I became a Real! Published! Author! Woo-hoo!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In which the great blog recap rolls on to probably the most important event of the last ten years: the arrival of SteelyKid. And a bunch of other bloggy stuff. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; There&#8217;s really no question what should be the featured image for this recap post: Clearly, it needs to be an early photo of SteelyKid,&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2012\/06\/20\/ten-years-before-the-blog-2008-2009\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Ten Years Before the Blog: 2008-2009<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":7220,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,2,668],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blogs","category-personal","category-ten_years","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7219","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7219"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7219\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7220"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}