{"id":694,"date":"2006-10-10T09:44:48","date_gmt":"2006-10-10T09:44:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/10\/10\/nice-music-library-itd-be-a-pi\/"},"modified":"2006-10-10T09:44:48","modified_gmt":"2006-10-10T09:44:48","slug":"nice-music-library-itd-be-a-pi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/10\/10\/nice-music-library-itd-be-a-pi\/","title":{"rendered":"Nice Music Library, It&#8217;d Be a Pity If Anything Happened to It&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Henry Farrell thinks he <a href=\"http:\/\/crookedtimber.org\/2006\/10\/09\/the-art-mafia\/\">sees a parallel between music critics and the Mafia<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>I think that there&#8217;s a similar problem in the relationship between music artists and music consumers, in which critics play a key brokerage role, just as the Mafia does in a rather different sphere of commercial relations. Critics serve to guarantee to the public that certain artists, certain music, is &#8216;good&#8217; (there are a whole bunch of sociological questions about what constitutes &#8216;good&#8217; in this sense that I don&#8217;t want to get into). But they also want to preserve their own role as critical intermediaries and arbiters of taste &#8211; in other words, they don&#8217;t want consumers to feel sufficiently secure in their own tastes that they can bypass the critic and formulate their own tastes about artists. Therefore, one could make a plausible case that critics have an incentive to inject certain amounts of aesthetic uncertainty into the marketplace, by deliberately writing reviews which suggest that bad artists are good, or that good artists are bad, so as to screw with the heads of the listening public. This ensures that the Plain Music-Punters of Ireland remain unsure of their own ability successfully to gauge artistic quality, and don&#8217;t start ignoring what pop critics say in favor of following their own aesthetic judgements.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s about the best explanation I&#8217;ve seen for the critical acclaim for the Streets&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t think you can really push this analogy all that far, but it was amusing. I doubt that critics are really consciously slipping in oddball reviews to mess with people&#8217;s heads. In the specific case of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pitchforkmedia.com\/\">Pitchfork<\/a>, which kicked the whole thing off, I think the &#8220;adolescent relationship to music&#8221; explanation offered in comments is probably closer. <\/p>\n<p>At the same time, though, there is a fairly real need for a reviewer to occasionally pan things, just so you know you&#8217;re not dealing with Harriet Klausner. And music critics do benefit from appearing to have more refined tastes than consumers, so I think the dynamic at work here is at least similar to what Henry describes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Henry Farrell thinks he sees a parallel between music critics and the Mafia: I think that there&#8217;s a similar problem in the relationship between music artists and music consumers, in which critics play a key brokerage role, just as the Mafia does in a rather different sphere of commercial relations. Critics serve to guarantee to&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/10\/10\/nice-music-library-itd-be-a-pi\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Nice Music Library, It&#8217;d Be a Pity If Anything Happened to It&#8230;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-694","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-music","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/694","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=694"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/694\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=694"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=694"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=694"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}