{"id":596,"date":"2006-09-14T10:43:57","date_gmt":"2006-09-14T10:43:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/09\/14\/the-next-string-theory\/"},"modified":"2006-09-14T10:43:57","modified_gmt":"2006-09-14T10:43:57","slug":"the-next-string-theory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/09\/14\/the-next-string-theory\/","title":{"rendered":"The Next String Theory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The current crop of String Theory Backlash books has a lot of people wondering about what will replace string theory as the top fad in theoretical physics. Other people (well, ok, me) are worried about a more important question: What will replace string theory as the most over-hyped area in theoretical physics?<\/p>\n<p>Dave Bacon selflessly offers up his own field of <a href=\"http:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/?p=1334\">quantum information<\/a>, noting that Lee Smolin praises quantum computing theorists as &#8220;young&#8221; and &#8220;smart.&#8221; As Dave notes, this is the physics equivalent of &#8220;hip&#8221; or &#8220;hot&#8221; in more general pop culture.<\/p>\n<p>And Scott Aaronson offers further evidence of the coming dominance of quantum information, pre-empting skeptics with a list of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scottaaronson.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/reasons-to-believe-ii-quantum-edition.html\">reasons to believe in quantum computation<\/a>. Is there any surer sign of scientific overreach than making dubious lists of accomplishments to justify your field? I don&#8217;t think so&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>It may take a while to arrive, but twenty years from now, when the science world is all abuzz about the publication of <cite>Peter Shor Is a Big Fat Idiot<\/cite>, remember, you heard it here first: Quantum Computing is the next String Theory.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>(Just in case it isn&#8217;t obvious, this is not a serious post&#8211; quantum computing is on more solid ground than string theory, and in no real danger of overhype&#8230;)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The current crop of String Theory Backlash books has a lot of people wondering about what will replace string theory as the top fad in theoretical physics. Other people (well, ok, me) are worried about a more important question: What will replace string theory as the most over-hyped area in theoretical physics? Dave Bacon selflessly&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/09\/14\/the-next-string-theory\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Next String Theory<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-596","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=596"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/596\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=596"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=596"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}