{"id":5718,"date":"2011-07-10T12:47:15","date_gmt":"2011-07-10T12:47:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2011\/07\/10\/great-moments-in-deceptive-gra\/"},"modified":"2011-07-10T12:47:15","modified_gmt":"2011-07-10T12:47:15","slug":"great-moments-in-deceptive-gra","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2011\/07\/10\/great-moments-in-deceptive-gra\/","title":{"rendered":"Great Moments in Deceptive Graphs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This morning, via Twitter, I ran across one of the most spectacular examples of deceptive data presentation that I&#8217;ve ever seen. The graph in question is reproduced in this <a href=\"http:\/\/econlog.econlib.org\/archives\/2011\/07\/job_satisfactio.html\">blog post by Bryan Caplan<\/a>, and comes from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aeaweb.org\/articles.php?doi=10.1257\/jep.25.1.159\">this econ paper<\/a> about benefits of education. The plot looks like this:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/467\/files\/2012\/04\/i-d6115deab0573e41c1f1fe88c566d5fb-jobsat.jpg\" alt=\"i-d6115deab0573e41c1f1fe88c566d5fb-jobsat.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n<p>This is one panel clipped out of a four-part graph, showing the percentage of survey respondents reporting that they are satisfied with their current job. The horizontal axis is the years of schooling for different categories of respondents. <\/p>\n<p>So, I looked at that, and said &#8220;Wow, people with more education are significantly happier with their jobs.&#8221; Then in the post, Caplan is talking about how small the effect is, and I said &#8220;What the hell?&#8221; then looked closely at the axis labels. Which actually span a tiny, tiny range of responses. A totally honest version of the black bars in the plot would look like this:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/467\/files\/2012\/04\/i-8e892b9cb30c1d8fa1b6c7e3e1bdf791-jobsat_0.png\" alt=\"i-8e892b9cb30c1d8fa1b6c7e3e1bdf791-jobsat_0.png\" \/><\/p>\n<p>That is, there&#8217;s very little difference between the four groups, with only a tiny shift up as you go to higher education. The fraction of people with post-graduate education who are satisfied with their jobs is only about 7 percentage points higher (9% of the total value) than the fraction of those who never completed high school who are satisfied with their jobs.<\/p>\n<p>By carefully choosing their vertical axis to start just barely below their minimum value, though, the authors have managed to create the impression that the post-graduate cohort is about 25 times more satisfied than the non-high-school cohort (based on counting pixels in the vertical bars). Which is really impressive&#8211; even the Excel auto settings do a better job, starting the vertical axis at around 0.74. It still exaggerates the effect, but isn&#8217;t anywhere near as far into &#8220;How to Lie With Statistics&#8221; territory than the published graph, which is a marvel of axis-limit deception.<\/p>\n<p>And economists wonder why they have a hard time getting physicists to take them seriously&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This morning, via Twitter, I ran across one of the most spectacular examples of deceptive data presentation that I&#8217;ve ever seen. The graph in question is reproduced in this blog post by Bryan Caplan, and comes from this econ paper about benefits of education. The plot looks like this: This is one panel clipped out&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2011\/07\/10\/great-moments-in-deceptive-gra\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Great Moments in Deceptive Graphs<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,147,11,82],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-data_presentation","category-playing-with-graphs","category-science","category-socialscience","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5718","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5718"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5718\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}