{"id":5558,"date":"2011-05-05T15:29:23","date_gmt":"2011-05-05T15:29:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2011\/05\/05\/alternatives-to-lab-reports\/"},"modified":"2011-05-05T15:29:23","modified_gmt":"2011-05-05T15:29:23","slug":"alternatives-to-lab-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2011\/05\/05\/alternatives-to-lab-reports\/","title":{"rendered":"Alternatives to Lab Reports?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An academic email list that I&#8217;m on has started a discussion of lab writing, pointing out that students in some lab classes spend more time on writing lab reports in a quasi-journal-article format format than they do taking and analyzing data. This &#8220;feels &#8221; wrong in many ways, and the person who kicked off the discussion did so by asking for alternatives to the journal-article style lab report.<\/p>\n<p>This is a recurring discussion in physics education, because everybody who teaches lab courses struggles with this issue (guess what I&#8217;m procrastinating from grading right now&#8230;). It&#8217;s made much worse by the fact that many students, particularly in intro courses, write so badly that it&#8217;s painful to read their labs. Even more annoying are the students who clearly <em>could<\/em> do better, but have chosen not to for some reason (I get really annoyed when students email me lab reports that are riddled with spelling errors, because I know that they can see the exact same squiggly red underlines that I do when I open their reports).<\/p>\n<p>The problem is, technical writing is an important skill for a scientist, and something that science majors need to learn. Which means we have to teach it in some way, and most of the alternatives I&#8217;ve seen proposed don&#8217;t serve that purpose&#8211; oral exams are a great way to tell whether a student understands the lab, and lab-specific questionnaires are an okay way of getting at that question, but they don&#8217;t teach <em>writing<\/em>. Blog posts or non-technical write-ups involve some writing, but it&#8217;s not technical writing. And anybody who thinks it&#8217;s easier for students to write pop-science style articles (<cite>Scientific American<\/cite> is the usual suggested template) has never tried to write good pop-science articles. It&#8217;s really hard to do well, in some ways harder to do well than technical writing.<\/p>\n<p>The best compromise cop-out seems to be having students write pieces of lab reports&#8211; just an Abstract, say, or just the Conclusion. Which sorta-kinda teaches technical writing, and does at least produce less volume of material to grade, but it&#8217;s not ideal by any stretch. Again, writing disembodied sections of a report can feel harder than writing the full report would be, particularly if it&#8217;s something like an Abstract or Conclusion, which require you to know what you would have put in all the sections you&#8217;re not writing.<\/p>\n<p>So it&#8217;s a Hard Problem, and I don&#8217;t have a good solution. Anybody out there with brilliant ideas along these lines should feel free to leave them (or pointers to them) in the comments, though.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An academic email list that I&#8217;m on has started a discussion of lab writing, pointing out that students in some lab classes spend more time on writing lab reports in a quasi-journal-article format format than they do taking and analyzing data. This &#8220;feels &#8221; wrong in many ways, and the person who kicked off the&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2011\/05\/05\/alternatives-to-lab-reports\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Alternatives to Lab Reports?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13,7,11,131],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academia","category-education","category-physics","category-science","category-science_writing","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5558\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}