{"id":551,"date":"2006-08-30T11:25:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-30T11:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/30\/on-wussy-songs\/"},"modified":"2006-08-30T11:25:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-30T11:25:00","slug":"on-wussy-songs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/30\/on-wussy-songs\/","title":{"rendered":"On &#8220;Wussy&#8221; Songs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Chuck Klosterman is a dangerous author for me to read. Not just because it leads to me <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/deep_thoughts_from_pop_culture.php\">posting quotes that upset people<\/a>, but because I like his writing in a way that tends to creep into my own writing. After he releases a new book, I have be be really careful when I blog about pop culture, or else I end up with bad imitation Klosterman all over my blog.<\/p>\n<p>(David Foster Wallace is another writer who has this effect on me&#8211; I was deleting footnotes for a week after I read <cite>Consider the Lobster<\/cite>&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>The safest thing to do would be to avoid the subject altogether until the feeling passes, but then links get stale, and anyway, I like to live on the edge (hence the posting of inflammatory stuff about atheists&#8230;). And really, how can you expect me to pass up a post (via <a href=\"http:\/\/jefitoblog.com\/blog\/?p=863\">jefitoblog<\/a> about <a href=\"http:\/\/downwithsnark.blogspot.com\/2006\/08\/on-wussiness-and-review-of-aols-111.html\">AOL&#8217;s list of the 111 Wussiest Songs of All Time<\/a>? (The original list is on AOL, but they huffily inform me that my browser isn&#8217;t up to their standard, so to hell with them. If you want to see the original format, Down With Snark has the link.)<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s stipulate in advance that &#8220;wussy&#8221; as an insult is offensive to many, and we shouldn&#8217;t belittle people by attributing stereotypical feminine characteristics to them. I didn&#8217;t pick the name, AOL did, so go complain to, um, Scalzi&#8211; he blogs for them, and could use a reality check after winning the Campbell (which he richly deserved, and not just because he <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scalzi.com\/whatever\/004417.html\">looks fetching in the tiara<\/a>.). That&#8217;s what they called the list, and I&#8217;m stuck with their name.<\/p>\n<p>So what about the songs? I&#8217;ll spare you comments on the full list, and just note that with a very few exceptions, it&#8217;s just a carnival of suck. I mean, &#8220;Sometimes When We Touch&#8221;? &#8220;She&#8217;s Like the Wind&#8221;? &#8220;Muskrat Love&#8221;? Yeesh.<\/p>\n<p>The important question is this: Is this a useful and consistent category of songs?<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Down With Snark offers the following criteria for ranking &#8220;wussiness&#8221;:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>In fact, I think the wuss scale should go like this, from least wussy to most.<\/p>\n<p>Songs sung to your current lover<\/p>\n<p>Songs sung to your relative<\/p>\n<p>Songs sung to your pet<\/p>\n<p>Songs sung to your ex plaintively wishing they would return<\/p>\n<p>Songs sung about (note, not to) someone you are not dating, plaintively wishing they would date you<\/p>\n<p>Songs sung about (note, not to) someone you are not dating, affirmatively stating that you are not good enough for them (the &#8220;Swayze\/Blunt Category&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>and the only two categories above Swayze\/Blunt<\/p>\n<p>Songs where you tell your current lover\/ex\/total stranger that you love them so much you are willing to never see them again.<\/p>\n<p>and<\/p>\n<p>Songs sung to or about anyone at all that contain some variation of &#8220;allow me to be near you and I will not attempt to have sex with you, and you can leave anytime you want&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>While I think we can probably agree that those last two categories are pretty damn wussy, the list as a whole is way too broad. I mean, &#8220;Songs sung to your ex plaintively wishing they would return&#8221; catches about a third of the Motown catalogue, and a quarter of all pop songs since 1950. Does &#8220;Ain&#8217;t Too Proud to Beg&#8221; really count as a &#8220;wussy&#8221; song? (&#8220;Tracks of My Tears&#8221; I&#8217;ll give you, but it&#8217;s still a fantastic tune&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m also not sure about the validity of the &#8220;about, not to&#8221; qualifier in a couple of those. This seems to be there to keep &#8220;Every Breath You Take&#8221; and Radiohead&#8217;s &#8220;Creep&#8221; from being on the list, and I think that might be cheating.<\/p>\n<p>So I&#8217;m not sold on those criteria. Of course, I&#8217;m not sure that whatever AOL was using makes any sense, either&#8211; &#8220;Walking On Sunshine&#8221; is a wussy song? It&#8217;s upbeat, up-tempo, and has a brass section, fer Chrissakes. <strong>Liking<\/strong> it might be deemed &#8220;wussy&#8221; in some circles, but there&#8217;s nothing inherently &#8220;wussy&#8221; about the song.<\/p>\n<p>(Also, given the heteronormative origin of &#8220;wuss&#8221; as an insult, can a song with a female lead vocal actually be deemed &#8220;wussy&#8221;? Is this something that Burt Reynolds and Jerome Bettis need to rule on?)<\/p>\n<p>In the end, I don&#8217;t think the list as currently constituted is particularly useful, unless the goal is to remind people of just how many really awful songs are out there. But, hey, it&#8217;s an excuse for a blog post.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chuck Klosterman is a dangerous author for me to read. Not just because it leads to me posting quotes that upset people, but because I like his writing in a way that tends to creep into my own writing. After he releases a new book, I have be be really careful when I blog about&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/30\/on-wussy-songs\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">On &#8220;Wussy&#8221; Songs<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-music","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=551"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/551\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}