{"id":5506,"date":"2011-04-09T10:52:21","date_gmt":"2011-04-09T10:52:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2011\/04\/09\/hugo-humiliation\/"},"modified":"2011-04-09T10:52:21","modified_gmt":"2011-04-09T10:52:21","slug":"hugo-humiliation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2011\/04\/09\/hugo-humiliation\/","title":{"rendered":"Hugo Humiliation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over in LiveJournal land, <a href=\"http:\/\/nwhyte.livejournal.com\/1698874.html\">nwhyte just finished reading all the Hugo-winning novels<\/a>, and provides a list of them with links to reviews or at least short comments. He also gives a summary list of his take on the best and worst books of the lot.<\/p>\n<p>The obvious thing to do with such a list, particularly in LiveJournal land, is to take the list and mark which ones you&#8217;ve read, and so on. In th interest of a little variety, though, let me suggest an alternate game: the academic parlor game &#8220;Humilation,&#8221; invented by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/books\/2008\/jun\/13\/david.lodge\">David Lodge<\/a>, in which literary academics admit to not reading various classic works, with the winner being the person who shares the most embarrassing gap in their reading. This seems like a natural use of the Hugo list, especially since it includes both enduring classics and works that there&#8217;s no shame in <em>not<\/em> reading&#8211; <cite>They&#8217;d Rather Be Right<\/cite> from 1955 is legendarily bad, for example.<\/p>\n<p>So, if you&#8217;re a science fiction fan, which of the classic works on that list of Hugo winners have you <em>not<\/em> read? The definition of &#8220;classic&#8221; is of course subjective,  and somewhat problematic to apply to books you haven&#8217;t read, but for the sake of the game, let&#8217;s go with &#8220;generally regarded as a good and important novel,&#8221; which is fuzzy but probably workable.<\/p>\n<p>My answer:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>There are several &#8220;classic&#8221; books on the list that I haven&#8217;t read, but I&#8217;ll go with Heinlein&#8217;s <cite>Starship Troopers<\/cite> for my answer, because Heinlein&#8217;s always good for a controversy. This is widely regarded as one of the founding works of the popular subgenre of military science fiction, but somehow I missed it back when I went through my Heinlein phase. I&#8217;m not sure how.<\/p>\n<p>In the twenty-odd years since, I&#8217;ve heard so many people talk about it that I don&#8217;t feel any deep need to read it. So it remains a significant gap in my classic SF reading (and the single work I haven&#8217;t read that I&#8217;m most likely to be told I <em>must<\/em> read, given the proclivities of Heinlein fans).<\/p>\n<p>So, that&#8217;s my admission. What highly regarded Hugo winner have <em>you<\/em> not read?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over in LiveJournal land, nwhyte just finished reading all the Hugo-winning novels, and provides a list of them with links to reviews or at least short comments. He also gives a summary list of his take on the best and worst books of the lot. The obvious thing to do with such a list, particularly&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2011\/04\/09\/hugo-humiliation\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Hugo Humiliation<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18,37,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academia","category-books","category-pop_culture","category-sf","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5506"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5506\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}