{"id":546,"date":"2006-08-29T11:27:04","date_gmt":"2006-08-29T11:27:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/29\/mars-and-venus-in-grad-school\/"},"modified":"2006-08-29T11:27:04","modified_gmt":"2006-08-29T11:27:04","slug":"mars-and-venus-in-grad-school","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/29\/mars-and-venus-in-grad-school\/","title":{"rendered":"Mars and Venus in Grad School"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It appears to be a good week for <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/deep_thoughts_from_pop_culture.php\">non-controversial posting<\/a>, so while I&#8217;m making enemies, I might as well go all out&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The recent call for book ideas from the Feminist Press has sparked an interesting <a href=\"http:\/\/twistedphysics.typepad.com\/cocktail_party_physics\/2006\/08\/geek_grrls_the_.html\">discussion at Cocktail Party Physics<\/a>, but I want to highlight <a href=\"http:\/\/twistedphysics.typepad.com\/cocktail_party_physics\/2006\/08\/geek_grrls_the_.html#comment-21614951\">one comment in particular<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>There is a lot more of a macho-subculture in the sciences than appears at first glance. For example, the quotes &#8220;Nobody gets an A in my class!&#8221; Or &#8220;You guys aren&#8217;t cut out for the sciences.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t know if you found those discouraging, but for young boys, those kinds of statements are challenges. They don&#8217;t discourage extra effort, young boys get told they can&#8217;t do stuff all the time, and it doesn&#8217;t seem to stop them.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This is really the only reason I&#8217;m ambivalent about some of the  proposals for attracting more women to physics. (More below the cut.)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Usually, when this subject comes up, a lot of time is spent denouncing the &#8220;macho&#8221; culture of physics&#8211; the whole &#8220;only the strong shall survive&#8221; thing that makes everything run on confrontation. There are calls for more sensitivity and openness, and a less aggressive approach to research, and I definitely agree that there are a lot of idiots out there who deserve to be leashed.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, though, one of my fondest professional memories is built around confrontation. When I was a post-doc, I went back to my old research group at NIST to give a colloquium about recent results, and like all colloquia there, it was a battle. I brought slides for a twenty-minute talk, and we called a halt after an hour and a half, with four slides to go. I think the title slide was the only one that didn&#8217;t draw some sort of challenge. It wasn&#8217;t done in a hostile way, mind, but they pushed at everything I said, and nothing got by them.<\/p>\n<p>That was the most fun I&#8217;ve ever had giving a talk. I knew the material backwards and forwards, and knew we were right about our conclusions, and I absolutely loved the challenge. I knew that there wasn&#8217;t a question they could ask that I couldn&#8217;t answer, and knowing for certain that I would win every argument was a huge kick. It was absolutely the high point of my speaking career.<\/p>\n<p>So I have a certain amount of sympathy for the current model. When I hear people call for a less confrontational approach to science, I worry that that means losing not just the hostile and belittling remarks&#8211; which absolutely and without question need to go&#8211; but also some of the stuff that works for me. I wouldn&#8217;t want colloquia in that group to be done any other way. ( I also think the &#8220;paper torture&#8221; process by which articles got written was tremendously effective, but that may be a subject for another post&#8230;) It was terrifying at times&#8211; in grad school, I had a mortal terror of the phrase &#8220;Before you leave that slide&#8230;&#8221;&#8211; but I&#8217;m not sure that a less confrontational approach would&#8217;ve worked as well for me.<\/p>\n<p>The real challenge for science in general is to find a way to simultaneously make science more accomodating for those who don&#8217;t like confrontation, without also sapping the motivation of those who respond well to the confrontational approach. After all, whatever we may think of the more testosterone-addled members of the profession, the current approach has been pretty effective at generating good science.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, there&#8217;s almost certainly no one-size-fits-all solution. Different people will respond to the same stimuli in different ways, and what drives one person away will only encourage another. It&#8217;s not even necessarily a function of gender&#8211; in some areas, I&#8217;m much more likely to turn away from confrontation than my sister is (she&#8217;s in law school at the moment&#8211; another field that doesn&#8217;t lack for confrontation&#8230;). The trick is knowing who to challenge, and who to encourage more gently, and finding a way to balance those two approaches.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It appears to be a good week for non-controversial posting, so while I&#8217;m making enemies, I might as well go all out&#8230; The recent call for book ideas from the Feminist Press has sparked an interesting discussion at Cocktail Party Physics, but I want to highlight one comment in particular: There is a lot more&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/29\/mars-and-venus-in-grad-school\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Mars and Venus in Grad School<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=546"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}