{"id":5139,"date":"2010-10-25T07:16:15","date_gmt":"2010-10-25T07:16:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/10\/25\/links-for-2010-10-25\/"},"modified":"2010-10-25T07:16:15","modified_gmt":"2010-10-25T07:16:15","slug":"links-for-2010-10-25","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/10\/25\/links-for-2010-10-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Links for 2010-10-25"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul class=\"delicious\">\n<li>\n<div class=\"delicious-link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tor.com\/blogs\/2010\/10\/hugo-nominees-introduction?utm_source=Feedburner%3A+Frontpage+Partial+RSS+Feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Torcom%2FFrontpage_Partial+%28Tor.com+Frontpage+Partial+-+Blog+and+Stories%29\">Hugo Nominees: Introduction | Tor.com | Science fiction and fantasy | Blog posts<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-extended\">&#8220;I haven&#8217;t, of course, read every single book nominated for the Hugos since 1953. (What have I been doing with my time?) If I haven&#8217;t read it, I shall say so, and I shall say why. Otherwise I shall talk briefly about the books and their place in the field. If I&#8217;m inspired to re-read a book and talk about it in detail, I&#8217;ll do that separately. I&#8217;ll be very interested to hear other opinions and especially suggestions for other things of the year that should have been nominated. My views are, of course, my views, but I&#8217;ll be interested to see if there is a consensus&#8211;my feeling is that for most years there is, and also that the Hugo nominators are often right, but there are occasionally some startling omissions and some live controversies out there.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m going to start with 1953 and stop with 2000, because I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s possible to have a proper historical perspective on anything closer than that.&#8221;<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-tags\">(tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/books\">books<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/literature\">literature<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/history\">history<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/sf\">sf<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/tor\">tor<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/blogs\">blogs<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/review\">review<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/awards\">awards<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/hugos\">hugos<\/a>)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"delicious-link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/listverse.com\/2010\/10\/23\/top-10-important-blunders-of-ancient-science\/\">Top 10 Important Blunders of Ancient Science &#8211; Top 10 Lists | Listverse<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-extended\">The title&#8217;s a little misleading&#8211; this is actually a list of pretty cool developments in early science that turned out not to be correct, but got people started thinking about the right questions.<\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-tags\">(tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/science\">science<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/history\">history<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/lists\">lists<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/optics\">optics<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/medicine\">medicine<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/chemistry\">chemistry<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/physics\">physics<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.delicious.com\/orzelc\/philosophy\">philosophy<\/a>)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hugo Nominees: Introduction | Tor.com | Science fiction and fantasy | Blog posts &#8220;I haven&#8217;t, of course, read every single book nominated for the Hugos since 1953. (What have I been doing with my time?) If I haven&#8217;t read it, I shall say so, and I shall say why. Otherwise I shall talk briefly about&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/10\/25\/links-for-2010-10-25\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Links for 2010-10-25<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5139","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-links_dump","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5139"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5139\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5139"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5139"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}