{"id":5086,"date":"2010-10-05T08:47:45","date_gmt":"2010-10-05T08:47:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/10\/05\/congratulations-to-andre-geim\/"},"modified":"2010-10-05T08:47:45","modified_gmt":"2010-10-05T08:47:45","slug":"congratulations-to-andre-geim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/10\/05\/congratulations-to-andre-geim\/","title":{"rendered":"Congratulations to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/nobelprize.org\/nobel_prizes\/physics\/laureates\/2010\/\">2010 Nobel Prize in Physics goes to Geim and Novoselov for their work on graphene<\/a>, a material consisting of one-atom-thick sheets of carbon atoms in a hexagonal array. This is one of those prizes that was basically inevitable, as graphene is one of the hot materials of the last couple of years. Hardly a week goes by without a couple of press releases touting some amazing new potential application.<\/p>\n<p>Joerg Heber has a <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.joerg.heber.name\/2010\/10\/05\/great-the-physics-nobel-prize-for-graphene-now-dont-overhype-it\/\">nice explanation of the basics of graphene<\/a>, including some cautionary notes about overhype. From an experimentalist&#8217;s perspective, the really cool thing about this prize is that the central experiment is so low-tech. Geim and Novoselov&#8217;s biggest discovery was that you can make graphene really easily by picking up tiny flakes of graphite (from pencil scribbles, say) with adhesive tape. You&#8217;ve got to like that kind of ingenuity, though it might be a little risky to let funding agencies know about this, particularly in the UK (&#8220;What do you mean, you need a billion pounds&#8217; worth of apparatus? The last guys to win a Nobel here used Scotch tape!&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>From a Nobel-watching perspective, this is interesting for two reasons: First, it&#8217;s one of the quicker prizes in recent memory, coming just six years after the experiments in question (matching the 2001 prize for BEC). Second, it&#8217;s only split two ways, rather than the maximum possible three, allowing lots of room for people to speculate\/pontificate about who should&#8217;ve gotten the third share. In a more light-hearted vein, <a href=\"http:\/\/backreaction.blogspot.com\/2005\/10\/from-ignobel-to-nobel-prize.html\">Stefan notes<\/a> that Geim had previously <a href=\"http:\/\/improbable.com\/ig\/ig-pastwinners.html#ig2000\">shared the Ig Nobel<\/a> for experiments involving a levitating frog, which may make him the first to win both prizes, especially in that order (I&#8217;m too lazy to check).<\/p>\n<p>While Geim and Novoselov were nominated in <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/09\/nobel_prize_betting_pool_1.php\">last year&#8217;s betting pool<\/a>, nobody put their names in to <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/09\/nobel_prize_betting_pool_2.php\">this year&#8217;s<\/a>, so no guest posts yet this year.<\/p>\n<p>(I&#8217;m still working on getting out of the hole I dug for myself by skipping town for five days last week, so regular blogging will not resume until next week at the earliest.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics goes to Geim and Novoselov for their work on graphene, a material consisting of one-atom-thick sheets of carbon atoms in a hexagonal array. This is one of those prizes that was basically inevitable, as graphene is one of the hot materials of the last couple of years. Hardly a&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/10\/05\/congratulations-to-andre-geim\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Congratulations to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[135,19,33,7,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5086","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-condensed_matter","category-experiment","category-in_the_news","category-physics","category-science","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5086","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5086"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5086\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5086"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5086"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5086"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}