{"id":502,"date":"2006-08-16T12:08:48","date_gmt":"2006-08-16T12:08:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/16\/framing-physics\/"},"modified":"2006-08-16T12:08:48","modified_gmt":"2006-08-16T12:08:48","slug":"framing-physics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/16\/framing-physics\/","title":{"rendered":"Framing Physics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Gene Expression, Razib is collecting <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/gnxp\/2006\/06\/evolution_in_less_than_10_word.php\">ten-word summaries of evolutionary theory<\/a>, with follow-up posts <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/gnxp\/2006\/08\/10_assertions_about_evolution_1.php\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/gnxp\/2006\/08\/10_assertions_about_evolution.php\">here<\/a>. Because I&#8217;m completely shameless about this sort of thing, I&#8217;m going to swipe the idea, and apply it to physics.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, physics as a discipline covers a bit more conceptual territory than &#8220;evolutionary theory,&#8221; so it&#8217;s probably impossible to boil down to a single statement of ten or fewer words, but Razib had to cop out as well, settling on ten ten-word statements. So let&#8217;s take that as a goal, and ask, following the original phrasing: If you had 10 words or less, what would you have the public master (and I mean internalize, not spit back as a creed) about physics?<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t have a complete answer for this, but I&#8217;ll offer a few suggestions below the fold. If I get enough interesting comments, I&#8217;ll try to compile a big list in a future post, with fame and fortune sure to accrue to those who come up with the best phrases.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>A good starting point (especially as I&#8217;m feeling like a lazy blogger today) is probably the volume titles for Thomas Moore&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.physics.pomona.edu\/sixideas\/siovv.html\"><cite>Six Ideas That Shaped Physics<\/cite> course<\/a>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Conservation Laws Constrain Interactions<\/li>\n<li>The Laws of Physics are Universal<\/li>\n<li>The Laws of Physics are Frame-Independent<\/li>\n<li>Electric and Magnetic Fields are Unified<\/li>\n<li>Particles Behave Like Waves<\/li>\n<li>Some Processes are Irreversible<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>As you might expect from a text designed for a two-semester intro course, those volumes cover a pretty wide range of physics, and do a reasonably good job of encapsulating the key ideas. For a deeper understanding, you&#8217;d probably want to revise #1 to encompass <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Noether's_theorem\">Noether&#8217;s theorem<\/a>&#8212; &#8220;Symmetries lead to conservation laws, and conservation laws constrain interactions,&#8221; maybe. Numbers two and three could be combined into a single statement: &#8220;The laws of physics are universal and frame-independent.&#8221; Number five could probably use an &#8220;and vice versa&#8221; at the end, and thermodynamics (number six) is famously summed up as &#8220;You can&#8217;t win, you can&#8217;t break even, you can&#8217;t quit.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That would get things down to five short statements, leaving five more. What else should be included?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Gene Expression, Razib is collecting ten-word summaries of evolutionary theory, with follow-up posts here and here. Because I&#8217;m completely shameless about this sort of thing, I&#8217;m going to swipe the idea, and apply it to physics. Of course, physics as a discipline covers a bit more conceptual territory than &#8220;evolutionary theory,&#8221; so it&#8217;s&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/16\/framing-physics\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Framing Physics<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}