{"id":498,"date":"2006-08-15T12:25:15","date_gmt":"2006-08-15T12:25:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/15\/the-high-cost-of-doing-physics\/"},"modified":"2006-08-15T12:25:15","modified_gmt":"2006-08-15T12:25:15","slug":"the-high-cost-of-doing-physics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/15\/the-high-cost-of-doing-physics\/","title":{"rendered":"The High Cost of Doing Physics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, I spent $52 (plus shipping) buying sand. Not a gret big sack of sand, either&#8211; just 200 grams of it. I count it as a bargain, too, because I was prepared to spend twice the amount for half as much.<\/p>\n<p>Now, granted, the $1000\/kg sand is extremely high purity silicon dioxide, designed to be used in putting high-quality coatings on optical elements, and I would&#8217;ve bought that if it hadn&#8217;t been back-ordered. The cheaper stuff is slightly lower purity&#8211; 99.9% instead of 99.95%&#8211; but it ought to work. And they had it in stock at Aldrich, so I decided to take a chance, and save $50 in the process.<\/p>\n<p>But still, I&#8217;m paying $260\/kg for sand.<\/p>\n<p>This is a little more absurd than the usual scenario, but weirdly high costs are part of doing physics these days. When you&#8217;re looking for specialized devices to do very specialized tasks, you end up shelling out a lot of money for things.<\/p>\n<p>Explaining the costs of things is one of the funnier parts of introducing research students to the lab. I had a student a couple of summers ago who shorted out a diode laser he was working with, and was really apologetic about it.<\/p>\n<p>(Continued below the fold&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t worry about it,&#8221; I said, &#8220;It was only about a hundred bucks.&#8221; His eyes just about came out of their sockets when he heard that, so I had to explain that that&#8217;s pretty cheap for a diode laser. I&#8217;ve got a bag full of diodes that were $10 each, but they&#8217;re basically useless to me. The ones that are useful cost between $100 and $500, and I&#8217;ve got two that were $675 apiece.<\/p>\n<p>And from the outside, they all look exactly like the lasers in a cheap CD player. &#8220;But, they&#8217;re so small!&#8221; my student said when I explained the price structure.<\/p>\n<p>The current controllers for those lasers range from about $300 (for a bare-bones model) to a bit over $1000 for a fancier model with a built-in display and a lot of safety features (money well spent, given the way the power has flickered on and off over the years). I went with the $300 temperature controllers, because they&#8217;re not as fragile. Miscellaneous other parts probably average out at $50 or so, putting the full grating-locked diode system at $2,000-2,500, not counting the cost of the labor to build the mounts. The higher-power laser I&#8217;m injection locking comes in at $1,500-$2,000<\/p>\n<p>And this is the cheap route. A commercial system to do the same thing would be between $5,000 and $10,000, depending on the manufacturer and the laser wavelength you&#8217;re after. The deluxe solution would do away with the injection-locked laser, replacing the whole thing with a titanium-sapphire laser system, which will set you back something on the high side of $150,000 for the Ti:sapph and a doubled YAG to pump it. I&#8217;m not sure of the exact price of that sort of system, as it&#8217;s just too depressing to get a solid estimate&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>And that&#8217;s just the lasers. If you want to do anything with that light, you need to move it around the lab by bouncing it off mirrors, and a research-quality dielectric mirror in an adjustable mount will set you back $110, when they&#8217;re on sale. I&#8217;ve got something like 75 of those in my lab at the moment, and I always need more. Lenses, beamsplitters, and waveplates start around a hundred bucks each, and go way up from there. The posts and clamps and holders to keep all this stuff in place are pretty cheap, but still, it adds up.<\/p>\n<p>And that&#8217;s not even touching the vacuum hardware.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve spent something in the neighborhood of $150,000 building up my lab, and I had the advantage of starting with a number of big items already in the room (three large optical tables being the most important part of that). The most expensive single item in the room is a turbopump system that set me back about $14,000 (thank you, NSF), which is at least impressive enough that the students don&#8217;t scoff when I tell them the price. The rest of that is made up of lots of little, expensive items.<\/p>\n<p>And I&#8217;m doing this whole thing on the cheap. A colleague who&#8217;s at a large research university on the west coast told me that he figured out he needs to raise $500,000 in external grants to keep his lab running. <strong>Every. Year.<\/strong> And that&#8217;s still AMO physics, which is the cheap, table-top stuff&#8211; everybody&#8217;s seen the eye-popping price tags that the big accelerators carry.<\/p>\n<p>So, really, it&#8217;s not surprising that a bunch of physicists managed to <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/true_lab_stories_strangest_gro.php\">blow through a million dollars<\/a> in a few short weeks. What would be surprising is if we <strong>hadn&#8217;t<\/strong> managed to find stuff to spend that money on.<\/p>\n<p>After all, I&#8217;m paying $260\/kg for sand.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, I spent $52 (plus shipping) buying sand. Not a gret big sack of sand, either&#8211; just 200 grams of it. I count it as a bargain, too, because I was prepared to spend twice the amount for half as much. Now, granted, the $1000\/kg sand is extremely high purity silicon dioxide, designed to be&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/15\/the-high-cost-of-doing-physics\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The High Cost of Doing Physics<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-498","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=498"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/498\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}