{"id":4909,"date":"2010-08-01T09:37:31","date_gmt":"2010-08-01T09:37:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/08\/01\/my-hugo-awards-ballot\/"},"modified":"2010-08-01T09:37:31","modified_gmt":"2010-08-01T09:37:31","slug":"my-hugo-awards-ballot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/08\/01\/my-hugo-awards-ballot\/","title":{"rendered":"My Hugo Awards Ballot"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The voting for the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aussiecon4.org.au\/index.php?page=66\">2010 Hugo Awards<\/a> closed last night. I sent in my ballot yesterday, but I&#8217;m trying to limit my computer time this weekend, so I didn&#8217;t post about it until today.<\/p>\n<p>The following lists are my votes, with miscellaneous commentary. The Hugos use a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thehugoawards.org\/the-voting-system\/\">complicated vote-counting scheme<\/a>, including a &#8220;No Award&#8221; option to distinguish between works you wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing win, even if they&#8217;re not your first choice, and works you consider so bad you would rather see them cancel the award than win.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\n<strong>Best Novel<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/03\/china_mieville_the_city_and_th.php\"><cite>The City and the City<\/cite><\/a> by China Mieville<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/09\/robert_charles_wilson_julian_c.php\"><cite>Julian Comstock<\/cite><\/a> by Robert Charles Wilson<\/li>\n<li><cite>Boneshaker<\/cite> by Cherie Priest<\/li>\n<li><cite>The Windup Girl<\/cite> by Paolo Bacigalupi<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/06\/hugo_reading_palimpsest_by_cat.php\"><cite>Palimpsest<\/cite><\/a> by Catherynne Valente<\/li>\n<li>NO AWARD<\/li>\n<li><cite>Wake<\/cite> by Robert Sawyer<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Comments: This came down to a mental coin flip between the Mieville and Wilson, more or less. I enjoyed the Wilson more, but I went with Mieville because the central idea of <cite>The City and the City<\/cite> was more original. Both are good books that seem a little on the show-offy side&#8211; a little bit of &#8220;look at what I can do!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Boneshaker<\/cite> was an entertaining read, but no more than that. It&#8217;s a steampunk zombie novel, which is intrinsically kind of goofy, and it doesn&#8217;t do anything surprising with that premise. <cite>Palimpsest<\/cite> and <cite>The Windup Girl<\/cite> are both more ambitious, and probably better books, but they&#8217;re both unpleasant enough that I didn&#8217;t finish either (I got about 70 pages into the latter, and decided I didn&#8217;t want to read more about those characters), so they drop below <cite>Boneshaker<\/cite>.<\/p>\n<p>I didn&#8217;t read the Sawyer, but nothing I&#8217;ve read suggests it would hold any interest for me.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best Novella<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>&#8220;Palimpsest&#8221; by Charles Stross<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Act One&#8221; by Nancy Kress<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Vishnu at the Cat Circus&#8221; by Ian McDonald<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;The Women of Nell Gwynne&#8217;s&#8221; by Kage Baker<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;The God Engines&#8221; by John Scalzi<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Shambling Toward Hiroshima&#8221; by James Morrow<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Comments: I was sorely tempted to put &#8220;NO AWARD&#8221; after either the Kress or McDonald, but ultimately decided that my irritation at the works below that point wasn&#8217;t strong enough to disqualify them. &#8220;Palimpsest&#8221; wins because while both of the top two were kind of obvious about where they were headed, I enjoy grand space opera more than personal melodrama.<\/p>\n<p>I came very close to &#8220;NO AWARD&#8221;-ing the Morrow, on the grounds that if you can&#8217;t carry a funny satirical treatment of WWII all the way through to the end, you probably shouldn&#8217;t start writing a funny satirical treatment of WWII. I decided not to in the end, but if I were voting again, I&#8217;d go through the whole argument again and it might come out differently.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best Novelette<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>&#8220;It Takes Two&#8221; Nicola Griffith<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Eros, Philia, Agape&#8221; by Rachel Swirsky<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Sinner, Baker, Fabulist, Priest; Red Mask, Black Mask, Gentleman, Beast&#8221; by Eugie Foster<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;One of Our Bastards Is Missing&#8221; by Paul Cornell<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;The Island&#8221; by Peter Watts<\/li>\n<li>NO AWARD<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Overtime&#8221; by Charles Stross<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&#8220;It Takes Two&#8221; is the strongest story in any of the short fiction categories, I think. It&#8217;s certainly the clear choice of this batch. The Swirsky  comes second despite being a crying-robot story, because the rest of the category is a muddle. &#8220;Sinner, etc.&#8221; is so high-concept that it remains almost totally abstract, with no real connection to the characters. Cornell&#8217;s story feels like it&#8217;s missing crucial context, and Watts&#8217;s story, while certainly inventive, is so overwrought that it becomes almost comical, sort of like the Smiths (the Mojo Nixon cover of &#8220;Girlfriend in a Coma&#8221; nails my reaction to pretty much Morrissey&#8217;s entire career).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Overtime&#8221; is a fucking Santa Claus joke, and annoyed me enough that it nearly cost Charlie the top spot in the Novella category.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Best Short Story<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>&#8220;Non-Zero Probabilities,&#8221; by N.K. Jemisin<\/li>\n<li>NO AWARD<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;The Moment&#8221; by Lawrence Schoen<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Bridesicle&#8221; by Will McIntosh<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;The Bride of Frankenstein&#8221; by Mike Fucking Resnick<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Spar&#8221; by Kij Johnson<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Comments: &#8220;Non-Zero Probabilities&#8221; is kind of a nothing story, a minor slice-of-life thing in a sort-of-cool setting. It gets the top spot here because it&#8217;s the only story on this part of the ballot that doesn&#8217;t fill me with rage.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Moment&#8221; is a cloying piece about time tourists visiting the Moon landing site because humans are Just That Cool, &#8220;Bridesicle&#8221; is just creepy, I will never again read or vote above &#8220;NO AWARD&#8221; any story by Mike Fucking Resnick after the crap he&#8217;s landed on the ballot the last few times I voted, and &#8220;Spar&#8221; is so awful I want to bleach my brain to get it out.<\/p>\n<p>Bleagh. What a mess.<\/p>\n<p>After that, I haven&#8217;t really read or seen enough to fill out complete ballots in a sensible manner. I put in a couple of votes for long-term editor and fan writer (Fred Pohl ahead of James Nicoll), and that&#8217;s about it.<\/p>\n<p>So, there are my votes in the fiction categories. Comments are welcome, as are suggestions of stuff that I ought to be reading this year to nominate for next year, so the next ballot isn&#8217;t quite so full of crap. I have a few thoughts on stuff I would rather have seen on the ballot than what&#8217;s actually here, but I&#8217;ll save those for a separate post.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The voting for the 2010 Hugo Awards closed last night. I sent in my ballot yesterday, but I&#8217;m trying to limit my computer time this weekend, so I didn&#8217;t post about it until today. The following lists are my votes, with miscellaneous commentary. The Hugos use a complicated vote-counting scheme, including a &#8220;No Award&#8221; option&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/08\/01\/my-hugo-awards-ballot\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">My Hugo Awards Ballot<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,37,29],"tags":[83,212,416,356,213,358],"class_list":["post-4909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-pop_culture","category-sf","tag-books-2","tag-fantasy","tag-fiction","tag-hugo-award","tag-science-fiction","tag-stories","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}