{"id":4904,"date":"2010-07-30T10:24:15","date_gmt":"2010-07-30T10:24:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/07\/30\/reader-request-quantum-complex\/"},"modified":"2010-07-30T10:24:15","modified_gmt":"2010-07-30T10:24:15","slug":"reader-request-quantum-complex","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/07\/30\/reader-request-quantum-complex\/","title":{"rendered":"Reader Request: Quantum Complexity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s some good stuff in yesterday&#8217;s post asking what physics you&#8217;d like to read more about. I&#8217;m nursing a sore neck and shoulder, so I&#8217;ll only do one or two quick ones today, starting with  <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/07\/what_physics_topics_would_you.php#comment-2689982\">James D. Miller in the first comment<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>1) Is it true that our understanding of quantum physics comes from studying systems with only a small number of particles and there is a good chance our theories won&#8217;t hold in more complex systems.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>It all depends on how you define your terms&#8211; what counts as a &#8220;small number&#8221; of particles, and what counts as not holding?<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s certainly true that most of the experiments to date on quantum foundations have used small numbers of particles&#8211; usually single-digit numbers of particles. The best tests of things like Bell&#8217;s theorem and the best examples of Schr&ouml;dinger cat states come from experiments on trapped ions that generally deal with only a couple of particles, and most of the theoretical effort has also focused on these simple systems.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not hard, though, to come up with examples of quantum fundamentals using much larger numbers of particles. To pick two that I cite in <a href=\"http:\/\/dogphysics.com\/><cite>How to Teach Physics to Your Dog<\/cite><\/a>, people have made superposition states involving <a href=\"http:\/\/physicsworld.com\/cws\/article\/print\/525\">millions of electrons in superconducting loops<\/a> (free registration required), and there are some beautiful experiments on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.univie.ac.at\/qfp\/research\/matterwave\/c60\/index.html\">diffraction of fullerene molecules<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>If 60 or 10,000,000 particles aren&#8217;t enough for you, there&#8217;s the entire field of condensed matter physics.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Condensed matter physics is fundamentally about what happens when you put together a really gigantic number of particles that obey quantum rules&#8211; the billions of billions of atoms and electrons inside a solid crystal. When you do that, you need different language to describe the material&#8211; it&#8217;s all about band structure and Fermi surfaces and that stuff&#8211; but fundamentally all that&#8217;s going on is the application of quantum mechanics to mind-bogglingly big numbers of particles.<\/p>\n<p>And condensed matter physics is generally pretty successful. There are some phenomena that emerge from it that you wouldn&#8217;t necessarily expect from a simple quantum picture&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/07\/whats_a_topological_insulator.php\">topological insulators<\/a>, say&#8211; and other phenomena that we don&#8217;t yet have a good explanation for&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com\/2010\/07\/29\/high-temperature-superconductivity\/\">high temperature superconductivity<\/a> is a good example&#8211; but the theory works really well.<\/p>\n<p>So, it really comes down to what you mean by &#8220;our theories won&#8217;t hold for more complex systems.&#8221; If you mean that there are likely to be phenomena that emerge from having macroscopic numbers of particles that we couldn&#8217;t easily predict from looking at the behavior of single-digit numbers of particles, then that&#8217;s absolutely true. Topological insulators, after all, are only a few years old, and while high-temperature superconductors have been around for twenty-odd years, we still don&#8217;t really understand those.<\/p>\n<p>If you mean that the behavior of complex systems will call into question the rules we have for the behavior of microscopic systems, though, I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s false. The rules for small numbers of particles have been tested to exquisite precision, and work extremely well. There&#8217;s not a lot of wiggle room there.<\/p>\n<p>The unexpected and so far unexplained phenomena observed in condensed matter systems are a result of the complex interactions of simple rules. At this point, I think I&#8217;m contractually obligated to mention Conway&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.conwaylife.com\/\">gmae of Life<\/a> and other such systems. The fact that you see complex behavior in the game does not suggest that there&#8217;s anything missing from the simple description of the rules. It just means that large numbers of particles following simple rules can give you surprisingly complex patterns. See also the <a href=\"http:\/\/emergentuniverse.org\/#\/home\">Emergent Universe<\/a> web site put together by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.icam-i2cam.org\/\">ICAM<\/a>, which has more examples of emergent complexity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s some good stuff in yesterday&#8217;s post asking what physics you&#8217;d like to read more about. I&#8217;m nursing a sore neck and shoulder, so I&#8217;ll only do one or two quick ones today, starting with James D. Miller in the first comment: 1) Is it true that our understanding of quantum physics comes from studying&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/07\/30\/reader-request-quantum-complex\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Reader Request: Quantum Complexity<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[135,7,23,11],"tags":[412,223,413,92,209,210,88,414,415],"class_list":["post-4904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-condensed_matter","category-physics","category-quantum_optics","category-science","tag-complexity","tag-condensed-matter","tag-emergence","tag-physics-2","tag-quantum-optics","tag-quantum-physics","tag-science-2","tag-superconductivity","tag-topological-insulators","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4904\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}