{"id":4533,"date":"2010-02-10T12:44:47","date_gmt":"2010-02-10T12:44:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/02\/10\/its-not-just-the-length-its-th\/"},"modified":"2010-02-10T12:44:47","modified_gmt":"2010-02-10T12:44:47","slug":"its-not-just-the-length-its-th","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/02\/10\/its-not-just-the-length-its-th\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s Not Just the Length, It&#8217;s the Content"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The never-ending discussion of whether the Web can or should replace books has shifted into the corners of blogdom that I follow again, with <a href=\"http:\/\/motherjones.com\/kevin-drum\/2010\/02\/read-more-books\">Kevin Drum arguing for more books<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/crookedtimber.org\/2010\/02\/09\/towards-a-world-of-smaller-books\/\">Henry Farrell arguing for shorter books<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/highclearing.com\/index.php\/archives\/2010\/02\/10\/10697\">Jim Henley agreeing with Henry, and expanding it to fiction<\/a>. They&#8217;re all at least partly right&#8211; more shorter books would be a good thing.<\/p>\n<p>I do want to pick up on one thing Kevin said, though. He writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>This is, I grant, a purely personal reaction, but one of my occasional frustrations with the blogosphere is a sense that people sometimes think they can understand complex issues merely by reading lots of blog posts and newspaper articles. I&#8217;m not so sure of that. There&#8217;s a big difference between a 100,000-word book on healthcare and 100,000 words of real-time commentary on healthcare. You can learn a lot from the latter, but very frequently you miss the big picture because (a) it&#8217;s not all there and (b) you have to put it together yourself over time. The result is a sort of glib and shallow understanding that can produce enjoyable polemics or good water cooler arguments, but not much more.<\/p>\n<p>A few hours spent with a carefully constructed book, on the other hand, can change the way you think about something by showing you history, context, and all the non-sexy stuff &#8212; in other words, all the messy complexity &#8212; in a single package that you absorb all at once. Basically, if you read <cite>Sick<\/cite>, you&#8217;re getting years of Jon Cohn&#8217;s distilled knowledge of American healthcare in a few hours. To get the same from his blog posts, you&#8217;d have to spend months or years reading them, and you still wouldn&#8217;t get it all.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The addition I would make (which is sort of implied, but could stand to be brought out more) is this: In addition to forcing arguments to be shorter, the normal operation of blogs changes the content of what&#8217;s presented. It&#8217;s not just that blogs lack context, it&#8217;s that they&#8217;re skewed toward topics that generate lots of argument.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>My stock example of this is the online discussion of Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.unscientificamerica.com\/\"><cite>Unscientific America<\/cite><\/a>. If you read the online commentary about it, you would think that three-quarters of the book was devoted to a concerted effort to suppress atheists online. That&#8217;s generated most of the discussion because there are dozens of people with blogs who leap on any excuse to rant and rave about religion or the lack thereof.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, material related to religion and particularly  <em>maybe<\/em> a quarter of the book. Religion is one of several factors they discuss as presenting problems for science in the US, and it&#8217;s not even the most important one. The stuff about atheist blogs is a single short chapter, which isn&#8217;t all that central to the overall argument.<\/p>\n<p>Reading about the subject online would give you a ridiculously skewed version of things, because people who run blogs post things that they think will bring in readers, and they respond to other people who talk about their hot-button issues, and pretty soon the whole conversation is given over to whatever people find most upsetting. Even somebody writing a blog with the best of intentions to give the full picture of things will end up pulled toward whatever the hot subjects are, by the dynamics of the medium.<\/p>\n<p>A book, on the other hand, can be a self-contained thing, and doesn&#8217;t need to respond in real time to whatever gets people&#8217;s panties in a twist. Which means you can give a more balanced picture, rather than being driven by the whims of the audience.<\/p>\n<p>I do agree with Henry and Jim that there are a great many books that could stand to be shorter, and it will be interesting to see if technology does, in fact, lead to more shorter books. I hope it doesn&#8217;t lead to <em>only<\/em> short works, though, because there are advantages to a sustained book-length argument that really aren&#8217;t possible to translate into the world of blogs and social media.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The never-ending discussion of whether the Web can or should replace books has shifted into the corners of blogdom that I follow again, with Kevin Drum arguing for more books, Henry Farrell arguing for shorter books, and Jim Henley agreeing with Henry, and expanding it to fiction. They&#8217;re all at least partly right&#8211; more shorter&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/02\/10\/its-not-just-the-length-its-th\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">It&#8217;s Not Just the Length, It&#8217;s the Content<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18,28,37],"tags":[122,118,83,87,149],"class_list":["post-4533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academia","category-books","category-politics","category-pop_culture","tag-academia-2","tag-blogs-2","tag-books-2","tag-politics-2","tag-publishing-2","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4533"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4533\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}