{"id":445,"date":"2006-08-01T10:56:42","date_gmt":"2006-08-01T10:56:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/01\/science-is-tedious\/"},"modified":"2006-08-01T10:56:42","modified_gmt":"2006-08-01T10:56:42","slug":"science-is-tedious","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/01\/science-is-tedious\/","title":{"rendered":"Science Is Tedious"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There have been a number of responses to my <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/07\/science_is_hard.php\">Science Is Hard<\/a> post over the last several days, and I&#8217;ve been trying to come up with something to say about them. In particular, Steinn points out that <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/catdynamics\/2006\/07\/science_and_hard_work_ii.php\">science is easier than digging ditches<\/a>, while in comments, &#8220;revere&#8221; of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scienceblogs.com\/effectmeasure\/\">Effect Measure<\/a> says that <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/07\/science_is_hard.php#c181810\">science is tedious, just like digging ditches<\/a>. Well, OK, that&#8217;s flippant&#8211; what he really said was:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The dirty secret we don&#8217;t teach our students is that most real research is tedious, time consuming and routine, just like any other kind of work. Whether you think it&#8217;s hard or the ride of a lifetime is primarily a matter of attitude.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with this at all&#8211; that&#8217;s actually another important point (after &#8220;this is not a three-hour lab&#8221;) thatb I struggle to get across to students. The work of science isn&#8217;t over when you get that first experimental signal&#8211; that&#8217;s when the real work <strong>begins<\/strong>, and it&#8217;s just as tedious as the preliminary plugging, what with all the cross-checks and control experiments and sanity checks and stupid little calibration tests that have to be repeated over, and over, and over.<\/p>\n<p>(Disagreement after the cut.)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s sort of orthogonal to the point I was trying to address in the earlier post, though, which was Jonah&#8217;s question about <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/cortex\/2006\/07\/why_do_scientists_have_to_work.php\">why there&#8217;s so much failure in science<\/a>. Most of our experiments fail not because we don&#8217;t care whether they work, or because we&#8217;re not good at our jobs, they fail because what we&#8217;re trying to do is an inherently difficult thing. All the easy experiments were done a hundred years ago, when they were difficult.<\/p>\n<p>I think the tedium is another facet of what life in science is about. We place a premium on repeatability, and while we may not spend much time <a href=\"http:\/\/biocurious.com\/experimental-replication\">replicating the work of others<\/a>, a big part of the research process is repeating the experiment in-house enough times to be sure that it&#8217;s a real effect, and not a temporary glitch, and that&#8217;s necessarily sort of tedious. Not to mention the days and weeks of banging away on equipment that stubbornly refuses to behave the way it&#8217;s supposed to.<\/p>\n<p>I happen to think the tedium is worth it for those days when things just work, and you either get the signal you expect, or a completely unexpected and wonderful signal. But I also think this is largely separate from the fact that the goal of original research is actually inherently difficult to achieve.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There have been a number of responses to my Science Is Hard post over the last several days, and I&#8217;ve been trying to come up with something to say about them. In particular, Steinn points out that science is easier than digging ditches, while in comments, &#8220;revere&#8221; of Effect Measure says that science is tedious,&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/08\/01\/science-is-tedious\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Science Is Tedious<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-445","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/445","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=445"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/445\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=445"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=445"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=445"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}