{"id":4385,"date":"2010-01-03T10:23:52","date_gmt":"2010-01-03T10:23:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2010\/01\/03\/2009-the-year-in-blog\/"},"modified":"2010-01-03T10:23:52","modified_gmt":"2010-01-03T10:23:52","slug":"2009-the-year-in-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/01\/03\/2009-the-year-in-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"2009: The Year In Blog"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s a new year, so that means it&#8217;s time to take a look back at the previous year. In graphical form, it looks like this:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/467\/files\/2012\/04\/i-2e08a3aeb37ca72224d1736ac8f0f115-2009_traffic.jpg\" alt=\"i-2e08a3aeb37ca72224d1736ac8f0f115-2009_traffic.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Clears it all up, doesn&#8217;t it? That&#8217;s the past year in blog traffic, showing pageviews per day. Integrate it all up, and it comes to 717,254 pageviews. That&#8217;s kind of mind-boggling, really. Even more mind-boggling is the fact that there have been 2,465,829 pageviews here since the move to ScienceBlogs in January 2006.<\/p>\n<p>So, what drew eyeballs this year? There were a total of 14 posts that drew more than 2,000 pageviews according to Google Analytics. In order, they were:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>29,141 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/09\/the_speed_of_god.php\">the Speed of God<\/a><\/li>\n<li>8,655 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/03\/why_does_excel_suck_so_much.php\">Why Does Excel Suck So Much?<\/a><\/li>\n<li>7,379 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/12\/the_bohr-einstein_debates_with.php\">The Bohr-Einstein Debates, With Puppets<\/a><\/li>\n<li>6,486 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/07\/unscientific_america_by_chris.php\"><cite>Unscientific American<\/cite> by Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum<\/a><\/li>\n<li>5,202 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/the_myth_of_the_abrasive_geniu.php\">The Myth of the Abrasive Genius<\/a><\/li>\n<li>4,174 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/10\/my_doomsday_weapon.php\">My Doomsday Weapon<\/a><\/li>\n<li>3,812 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/05\/the_faulty_thermodynamics_of_c.php\">The Faulty Thermodynamics of Children&#8217;s Stories<\/a><\/li>\n<li>3,686 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/07\/pop_quiz_michelson_interferome.php\">Pop Quiz: Michelson Interferometer<\/a><\/li>\n<li>3,534 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/the_limits_of_elven_vision.php\">The Limits of Elven Vision<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2,905 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/05\/malcolm_gladwell_is_no_charles.php\">Malcolm Gladwell Is No Charles Barkley<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2,654 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/09\/volume_packing_of_breakfast_ce.php\">Volume Packing of Breakfast Cereal<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2,512 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/09\/nobel_prize_betting_pool_1.php\">Nobel Betting Pool<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2,436 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/10\/stargate_universe_and_the_myth.php\"><cite>Stargate: Universe<\/cite> and the Myth of the Lone Genius<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2,378 views: <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/09\/dehumanizing_the_two_cultures.php\">Dehumanizing the Two Cultures<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Again: clears everything right up, doesn&#8217;t it?<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>On the one hand, the two posts that I liked enough to add to the &#8220;Greatest Hits&#8221; sidebar, <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/science_is_what_makes_us_human.php\">Science Is What Makes Us Human<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/07\/this_is_my_job.php\">This <em>Is<\/em> My Job<\/a>, were nowhere near the top 14, with 993 and 917 views, respectively. On the other hand, that&#8217;s a pretty decent list of stuff. OK, the top two are a bit of fluff and what&#8217;s most likely search engine catharsis, and a couple of them get a little ranty, but there&#8217;s some decent science content in there. Some of it is a little silly, but then, I&#8217;m currently promoting a <a href=\"http:\/\/dogphysics.com\/\">book about talking to my dog<\/a>, so that seems fair enough.<\/p>\n<p>What conclusions can we draw from this? Well, silly sells. Also, insulting famous people continues to work well (<a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/10\/a_o_scott_is_an_ignoramus.php\">A.O. Scott Is an Ignoramus<\/a> was at 1,694 views, three spots off the list). There was less intra-blog squabbling this year than some past years, mostly because I was making a real effort to avoid reading the sorts of blogs that annoy me. I didn&#8217;t do much for ResearchBlogging this year, but nothing I did for them was even close.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, if you want to know what I did last year, blog-wise, there&#8217;s the executive summary. It&#8217;s fairly representative of what I usually post, so if you&#8217;re new here, and want to know what to expect, there you go.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s a new year, so that means it&#8217;s time to take a look back at the previous year. In graphical form, it looks like this: Clears it all up, doesn&#8217;t it? That&#8217;s the past year in blog traffic, showing pageviews per day. Integrate it all up, and it comes to 717,254 pageviews. That&#8217;s kind of&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2010\/01\/03\/2009-the-year-in-blog\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">2009: The Year In Blog<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4385","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogs","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4385","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4385"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4385\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}