{"id":3725,"date":"2009-06-02T09:38:06","date_gmt":"2009-06-02T09:38:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/02\/wanted-better-hugo-nominees\/"},"modified":"2009-06-02T09:38:06","modified_gmt":"2009-06-02T09:38:06","slug":"wanted-better-hugo-nominees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/02\/wanted-better-hugo-nominees\/","title":{"rendered":"Wanted: Better Hugo Nominees"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m eligible to vote for the Hugos this year, as a paid-up member of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.anticipationsf.ca\/\">Anticipation<\/a>. As such, I got the free packet of nominated works that they put together for the voters, and have started working my way through the short fiction (I&#8217;ve read all the novel nominees that I&#8217;m going to). Whether you&#8217;re eligible to vote or not, you can get links to most of the nominated works <a href=\"http:\/\/mentatjack.com\/2009\/03\/22\/2009-hugo-ballot\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve only read the Short Story nominees so far, and I have to say, I would vote for &#8220;No Award&#8221; five times if it was a choice between that and &#8220;Article of Faith&#8221; winning. I really could&#8217;ve sworn that this vein of crap was played out back in the 80&#8217;s, when I was a teenager and already getting sick of this sort of story. And yet, this kind of stuff keeps ending up on the ballot&#8211; I warned Kate off it by describing it as a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.asimovs.com\/_issue_0406\/robotsdontcry.shtml\">crying robot<\/a> tale, because it&#8217;s awful in the same way. And, in fact, it&#8217;s by the same author.<\/p>\n<p>At this point, I&#8217;m seriously considering skipping Resnick&#8217;s novelette nominee entirely. There&#8217;s really only so much maudlin crap I can take at this point in the academic year.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve read the other four nominees, all of which are pretty slight, but better than &#8220;Article of Faith.&#8221; Still, if this is the best short fiction the field has to offer, then maybe the death of SF magazines isn&#8217;t such a tragedy after all.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>More specific comments:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Exhalation&#8221; by Ted Chiang is, well, a Ted Chiang story, with a really detailed look at a different universe, working through the implications of his imaginary physics in a rigorous way. It&#8217;s a little too obviously about entropy, in the end, but probably the best of this lot.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;26 Monkeys, Also the Abyss&#8221; by Kij Johnson is probably the second best of the nominees. It&#8217;s a quirky story in a Kelly Link sort of vein, and I enjoyed reading it. It&#8217;s pretty close to the Chiang, really.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Evil Robot Monkey&#8221; by Mary Robinette Kowal is a very short anecdote that doesn&#8217;t really go anywhere. It reads kind of like she had the idea for the title, and wrote a short story to go with it.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;From Babel&#8217;s Fall&#8217;n Glory We Fled&#8221; by Michael Swanwick is really good, sketching out an interesting alien society, interesting future technology, and with a good and interesting plot. And then it just&#8230; stops, with an abrupt and arbitrary ending that seems sort of like he needed to wrap it up before the word count exceeded the &#8220;Short Story&#8221; category.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m eligible to vote for the Hugos this year, as a paid-up member of Anticipation. As such, I got the free packet of nominated works that they put together for the voters, and have started working my way through the short fiction (I&#8217;ve read all the novel nominees that I&#8217;m going to). Whether you&#8217;re eligible&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/06\/02\/wanted-better-hugo-nominees\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Wanted: Better Hugo Nominees<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,37,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-pop_culture","category-sf","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}