{"id":3688,"date":"2009-05-16T05:00:33","date_gmt":"2009-05-16T05:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/05\/16\/links-for-2009-05-16\/"},"modified":"2009-05-16T05:00:33","modified_gmt":"2009-05-16T05:00:33","slug":"links-for-2009-05-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/05\/16\/links-for-2009-05-16\/","title":{"rendered":"links for 2009-05-16"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul class=\"delicious\">\n<li>\n<div class=\"delicious-link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.prospect.org\/cs\/articles?article=the_trouble_with_double_x\">The Trouble with Double X | The American Prospect<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-extended\">&quot;In the site&#8217;s introductory video, one of the editors, Hanna Rosin, says, &quot;If you take something like Slate and you have it edited by three women, instead of the people it&#8217;s edited by, well that&#8217;s the kind of magazine that we want to turn out.&quot; She goes on to say that the articles they publish &quot;don&#8217;t have to be &#8216;women&#8217;s issues&#8217;&quot; &#8212; she bends her fingers to make air-quotes &#8212; &quot;in the way that people have always defined women&#8217;s issues. There can be a whole range of issues and you just put them through a slightly different lens.&quot; Color me baffled. Wouldn&#8217;t Slate, edited by these insanely smart and accomplished women, just be \u00e2\u0080\u00a6 Slate? Couldn&#8217;t they apply that &quot;slightly different lens&quot; to articles on the primary site and market them to all readers? &quot;<\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-tags\">(tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/politics\">politics<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/society\">society<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/culture\">culture<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/gender\">gender<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/writing\">writing<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/internet\">internet<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/diversity\">diversity<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/slate\">slate<\/a>)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"delicious-link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/cognitivedaily\/2009\/05\/casual_fridays_whats_sexist_de.php\">Casual Fridays: What&#8217;s sexist? Depends on what order you read the story in : Cognitive Daily<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-extended\">&quot;Many readers felt that this story was sexist because it promotes unfair stereotypes about men and women. So, I said, we&#8217;d put it to the test and ask our readers how sexist various situations were. Over 1,600 people responded.<\/p>\n<p>As some of you suspected, that&#8217;s not all that was going on with the survey. I was interested in whether you thought that story was sexist, but I was also interested in how context can affect judgments about sexism. So respondents were divided into four different groups. While everyone rated brief scenarios for how &quot;sexist&quot; one of the characters or the entire story was, different groups saw different scenarios.&quot;<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-tags\">(tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/psychology\">psychology<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/society\">society<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/culture\">culture<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/gender\">gender<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/diversity\">diversity<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/cog-daily\">cog-daily<\/a>)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"delicious-link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/worldnews\/asia\/china\/5170898\/Chinese-craze-for-English-tattoos.html\">Chinese craze for English tattoos &#8211; Telegraph<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-extended\">&quot;Zhang Aiping, a tattooist at Tattoo 108 in Shanghai, said: &quot;Around 30 per cent to 40 per cent of our customers are choosing tattoos in English letters now. This has happened really suddenly, since the beginning of this year.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;I just did one a few days ago for a footballer at Shanghai Shenhua club. It said: &#8216;I miss u forever&#8217;.&quot;&quot;<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-tags\">(tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/culture\">culture<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/language\">language<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/world\">world<\/a>)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div class=\"delicious-link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/illusioncontest.neuralcorrelate.com\/2009\/the-break-of-the-curveball\/\">The break of the curveball \u00c2\u00ab Best Visual Illusion of the Year Contest<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-extended\">A freaky little illusion from the Vision Sciences Society.<\/div>\n<div class=\"delicious-tags\">(tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/science\">science<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/psychology\">psychology<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/orzelc\/internet\">internet<\/a>)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Trouble with Double X | The American Prospect &quot;In the site&#8217;s introductory video, one of the editors, Hanna Rosin, says, &quot;If you take something like Slate and you have it edited by three women, instead of the people it&#8217;s edited by, well that&#8217;s the kind of magazine that we want to turn out.&quot; She&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/05\/16\/links-for-2009-05-16\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">links for 2009-05-16<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3688","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-links_dump","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3688","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3688"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3688\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3688"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3688"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3688"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}