{"id":3611,"date":"2009-04-21T10:06:02","date_gmt":"2009-04-21T10:06:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/04\/21\/strunk-and-white-is-not-for-yo\/"},"modified":"2009-04-21T10:06:02","modified_gmt":"2009-04-21T10:06:02","slug":"strunk-and-white-is-not-for-yo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/04\/21\/strunk-and-white-is-not-for-yo\/","title":{"rendered":"Strunk and White Is Not for You"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I tagged <a href=\"http:\/\/chronicle.com\/free\/v55\/i32\/32b01501.htm\">Geoffrey Pullum&#8217;s rant against <cite>The Elements of Style<\/cite><\/a> for del.icio.us a few days back, because it struck me as interesting, but I didn&#8217;t have time to say more. In the subsequent days, I&#8217;ve seen a bunch of &#8220;Preach it, Brother Pullum!&#8221; responses, most recently from <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/effectmeasure\/2009\/04\/elements_of_styles_needless_wo.php\">revere<\/a>. I&#8217;ve also received the copyedited manuscript of the book-in-production, so I&#8217;ve been thinking a bit about grammar and style in my own writing.<\/p>\n<p>Most of the pro-Pullum responses I&#8217;ve seen seem to me to be missing the point. Or, rather, they&#8217;re criticizing the book because it&#8217;s not very good as an absolute and prescriptive guide to what constitutes good writing, when that isn&#8217;t what the book <em>is<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Many of the practices and constructions that Strunk and White rail against are perfectly good, and occasionally essential. Good writers can, do, and even <em>should<\/em> use many of these elements in their writing, and indeed, Strunk and White use some of these elements in their own book. The thing is, Strunk and White isn&#8217;t intended as a prescriptive guide for people who are already good writers&#8211; it&#8217;s more of an aspirational guide for people who aren&#8217;t good writers <em>yet<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>While a slavish adherence to the rules presented in <cite>The Elements of Style<\/cite> would have unfortunate results for people who already write well, it would be a clear improvement for most college students. Just an <em>attempt<\/em> to follow the guidelines in Strunk and White would make most of the lab reports I have to grade dramatically better. <\/p>\n<p>Strunk and White isn&#8217;t going to teach you the grammar you need to know to become &#8220;head of linguistics and English language at the University of Edinburgh&#8221; like Geoffrey Pullum, in the same way that Halliday and Resnick isn&#8217;t going to teach you the physics you need to know to become a college professor. There will come a time when you need to move beyond the most basic textbooks. But when you&#8217;re just starting out, they&#8217;ll give you the basic ideas that you need to get your feet under you, and prepare yourself for the next steps.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I tagged Geoffrey Pullum&#8217;s rant against The Elements of Style for del.icio.us a few days back, because it struck me as interesting, but I didn&#8217;t have time to say more. In the subsequent days, I&#8217;ve seen a bunch of &#8220;Preach it, Brother Pullum!&#8221; responses, most recently from revere. I&#8217;ve also received the copyedited manuscript of&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/04\/21\/strunk-and-white-is-not-for-yo\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Strunk and White Is Not for You<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[67,18,13,104,130,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-book_writing","category-books","category-education","category-humanities","category-journalism","category-pop_culture","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3611\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}