{"id":3533,"date":"2009-03-25T09:37:44","date_gmt":"2009-03-25T09:37:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/03\/25\/academic-poll-breadth-or-depth\/"},"modified":"2009-03-25T09:37:44","modified_gmt":"2009-03-25T09:37:44","slug":"academic-poll-breadth-or-depth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/03\/25\/academic-poll-breadth-or-depth\/","title":{"rendered":"Academic Poll: Breadth or Depth?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I fell behind on course reports from my modern physics class a few weeks back, but I do mean to get back to them, when I have more time. The material remaining is the end-of-term sprint through a bunch of topics in modern physics&#8211; three classes on atoms and molecules, three classes on solid state physics, three classes on nuclear and particle physics.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a mad dash through a lot of material (as the eventual course-wrap-up post will make clear), which raises one of the eternal questions of academia:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>When teaching undergraduate students about a discipline, which is more important, breadth or depth?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>That is, is it better for students to know a lot about a couple of fields, or a little about everything?<\/p>\n<p>You can find both approaches in different parts of academia. My own undergraduate education went for depth&#8211; there were multiple faculty members who did research in AMO physics, so the curriculum had a strong focus on optics and atoms, but I never had any classes on nuclear or particle physics. Union&#8217;s curriculum goes the other way, with a &#8220;modern physics&#8221; class that attempts to cover as many fields as possible, at the cost of not going into much depth about any of them.<\/p>\n<p>Each approach has its pros and cons, and it&#8217;s not clear to me that one is strongly preferable to the other. I&#8217;m curious about what other people think, though. So if you were designing your ideal science curriculum, which would you go for?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I fell behind on course reports from my modern physics class a few weeks back, but I do mean to get back to them, when I have more time. The material remaining is the end-of-term sprint through a bunch of topics in modern physics&#8211; three classes on atoms and molecules, three classes on solid state&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/03\/25\/academic-poll-breadth-or-depth\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Academic Poll: Breadth or Depth?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13,7,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academia","category-education","category-physics","category-science","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3533"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3533\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}