{"id":3408,"date":"2009-02-12T09:31:05","date_gmt":"2009-02-12T09:31:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/02\/12\/interesting-stuff-at-boskone\/"},"modified":"2009-02-12T09:31:05","modified_gmt":"2009-02-12T09:31:05","slug":"interesting-stuff-at-boskone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/02\/12\/interesting-stuff-at-boskone\/","title":{"rendered":"Interesting Stuff at Boskone"},"content":{"rendered":"

I usually post something here about what panels look interesting when the Boskone program goes up on the web. This year’s program<\/a> went up over the weekend, and I’m just now getting around to making a list of worthwhile items. This tells you what kind of week I’m having.<\/p>\n

Anyway, I looked the program over this morning, and here’s what I came up with:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Friday 7:30pm Independence:
\nReading<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rosemary Kirstein<\/p>\n

We won’t be able to leave Schenectady until 4pm or so, so the odds of making it to this are pretty slim. I’m really curious to know what the status of the Steerswoman books is, though.<\/p>\n

Friday 8pm Griffin:
\nReading<\/strong><\/p>\n

Jo Walton<\/p>\n

This is somewhat more likely. Still a bit og a long shot, though.<\/p>\n

Friday 9pm Galleria:
\nJane Yolen’s Birthday Party<\/strong><\/p>\n

The New York Times called her “a modern equivalent of Aesop”….though there’s
\nno truth to the rumor that this Boskone favorite’s career is so long and
\ndistinguished (317 books and probably more awards) that she once dated<\/i> Aesop.
\nHowever, Jane does have a birthday this week. Let’s help her celebrate with
\ntreats, games, singing, and maybe even a little dance. And – there will be
\nchocolate too!<\/p>\n

Jane Yolen<\/p>\n

This is most likelythe first thing we’ll appear at. Depending on her feeding schedule, SteelyKid may or may not be with us.<\/p>\n

Friday 11pm Galleria:
\nMusic Jam<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rock, blues, jazz, folk – separately and in combinations….a music jam modeled
\nafter the “Minnesota Music Parties”….we thik you’ll enjoy it here in the east
\ntoo!<\/p>\n

Alan F. Beck, Peter J. Heck, Rosemary Kirstein, Elise Matthesen, Patrick Nielsen Hayden, Faye Ringel, Jon Singer, Adam Stemple, Sonya Taaffe<\/p>\n

Music is good. But 11pm is really late, especially since we’ll be driving down there during the afternoon.<\/p>\n

Saturday 10am Burroughs:
\nPhysics: What We Don’t Understand<\/strong><\/p>\n

In 1999 John Cramer wrote a column in Analog describing seven big unsolved
\nproblems in physics (including the nature of dark matter, the origin of ultra-
\nhigh energy cosmic rays, and the origin of the arrow of time). Today, in 2008,
\nthree of these problems have been solved. We’ll talk about the seven problems,
\nthe three which have been solved, our current understanding of the rest, and
\nperhaps add some new problems to the list.<\/p>\n

Geoffrey A. Landis, Mark L. Olson (m), Chad Orzel, Karl Schroeder, Ian Tregillis<\/p>\n

What could be more interesting than poorly understood physics?<\/p>\n

Saturday 11am Griffin:
\nQuantum Physics: Many Worlds?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Chad Orzel<\/p>\n

On my PowerPoint slides, the title is “Quantum Physics for Dogs: Many Worlds, Many Treats?” It will include a dramatic reading of the dog dialogue from Chapter 4, so if you’ve ever wanted to see me embarrass myself by doing a silly voice in public, here’s your chance.<\/p>\n

Saturday 12noon Carlton:
\nExtra-solar Planets<\/strong><\/p>\n

Once upon a time there were n\/i\/n\/e\/ eight planets, but now there are over three
\nhundred scattered through hundreds of solar systems. What do they tell us about
\nplanets that we didn’t know before? What do they tell us about our own Solar
\nSyetem? Is it typical or is it a freak? How common are planets, anyway? The
\nSolar System has one habitable planet, one margially habitable (Mars) and
\nseveral more (Europa, Titan, possibly Enceladus) than might bear life—does it
\nseem likely that habitable planets are common in the universe? Talk about the
\ninteresting oddities—what are we finding out there? What are the prospects
\nfor the future?<\/p>\n

Noon is most likely lunchtime, but this has an outside chance.<\/p>\n

Saturday 1pm Burroughs:
\nThe Fragmented Genre<\/strong><\/p>\n

All the King’s horses and all the King’s men, couldn’t put SF together again!
\nOnce upon a time, SF was simple—it was about spaceships and the occasional
\nodd fantasy didn’t count. Now there is quest fantasy and war porn and
\nparanormal romance and novelizations of games and magical realism and fantasy
\nhardboiled detectives and who knows what else. Is SF fragmenting? Is this
\nlikely to be a good or bad thing for the genre? Will it bring in new readers?
\nProvide new markets for the writers? Or will it sap our precious bodily fluids?<\/p>\n

A possibility, or maybe a really extended lunch break\/ Dealer’s Room trip.<\/p>\n

Saturday 1pm Independence:
\nReading<\/strong><\/p>\n

Debra Doyle<\/p>\n

Or there’s this. <\/p>\n

Saturday 2pm Harbor 1:
\nAIs and Angels<\/strong><\/p>\n

If an artificial intelligence is powerful enough, might it just as well be an
\nangel? A god? (Can we worship something we ourselves create—or is that all
\nwe’ve ever done?) What light do Banks’s Minds, Vinge’s Transcended Powers,
\nClarke’s Third Law, or our panelists’ work shed on the boundary area between
\nmachine and deus ex machina? And in story terms, don’t advanced AIs suffer from
\nSuperman Syndrome? (The more superduperness, the less suspense.) At a certain
\nlevel, is there a (firm?) border between the technological and the numinous?<\/p>\n

Jeffrey A. Carver (m), Walter H. Hunt, Karl Schroeder, Charles Stross, Shane Tourtellotte<\/p>\n

Saturday 2pm Harbor 2:
\nThe Inclue and Other Smart Writing Tricks<\/strong><\/p>\n

Its inventor, our Guest of Honor Jo Walton, defines “incluing” as “the process of scattering information seamlessly through the text, as opposed to stopping the story to impart the information.” What other tactics do good writers get up to? We’ll discuss fresh ways of looking at how working writers do what they do<\/p>\n

Greer Gilman, James D. Macdonald, Teresa Nielsen Hayden, Mary A. Turzillo, Jo Walton (m)<\/p>\n

Saturday 2pm Harbor 3:
\nStories That Changed Everything<\/strong><\/p>\n

Not necessarily the best, or your favorites. But which works of science fiction,
\nfantasy, or horror changed the paradigm? For better or worse, which actually
\ntook the genre—or the world—in a new direction? How? Why? How have they
\ninfluenced your own work?<\/p>\n

Theodora Goss, David G. Hartwell, James Patrick Kelly, Sarah Langan (m), Farah Mendlesohn<\/p>\n

2pm is Exhibit A in the “All of the good stuff is on at the same time” case.<\/p>\n

Saturday 3pm Harbor 2:
\nThe Year in Astronomy and Physics<\/strong><\/p>\n

So what happened in astronony and physics in 2008? Old mysteries solved? New
\nmysteries found? Join us for the annual panel on the wonders of our universe!<\/p>\n

Jeff Hecht, Geoffrey A. Landis, Mark L. Olson<\/p>\n

This generally tends to involve more astronomy than physics, but it’s the best 3pm has to offer.<\/p>\n

Saturday 4pm Harbor 1:
\nIs Setting in SF Limited?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Is the near future mined out? (Is it even possible<\/b>, anymore, to write exciting
\nSF about a trip to the moon?) Have all the exciting things in the universe
\nalready been overused? How can fresh and exciting backdrops for fresh and
\nexciting fiction be created? Give examples!<\/p>\n

Michael F. Flynn, Glenn Grant (m), Geoffrey A. Landis, Karl Schroeder, Allen M. Steele<\/p>\n

This has some potential as a source of story recommendations. And both Landis and Schroeder are great idea guys.<\/p>\n

Saturday 4pm Harbor 2:
\nHow Underwear Reflects Sexuality in Cultures<\/strong><\/p>\n

From boxers to bikinis, girdles to corsets, what does our underwear—or lack
\nthereof—say about our culture? Is it wrong for senior citizens to sport G-
\nstrings under their pantsuits? For pre-teens to invest in push-up bras? A
\n(somewhat) light-hearted look at what out unmentionables (and why, we ask you?)
\nmention about us<\/b>.<\/p>\n

Beth Bernobich, Katherine Macdonald (m), Elise Matthesen, Josepha Sherman, Edie Stern<\/p>\n

Here’s the WTF? panel of the convention.<\/p>\n

Saturday 5pm Harbor 1:
\nThe Destruction of Hope<\/strong><\/p>\n

When Pandora let the ills out of the box, hope was left. If you destroy hope
\nthere will be nothing….true\/false? So, how\/why if you take away everything
\nfrom a character would anyone care about the character? What can be salvaged (or
\nlearned) from the wreakage of an individual or society when nothing remains? Why
\nbother writing about such
\ndesolation….doom….gloom…
.death….destruction…..
darkness….and
\ndespair….?<\/p>\n

Suzy McKee Charnas, James Morrow, Teresa Nielsen Hayden, Mary A. Turzillo (m), Jo Walton<\/p>\n

This sounds cheerful…<\/p>\n

Saturday night features a variety of drmatic type things, which I may make it to. Or I may go to bed early, because damn, I’m tired.<\/p>\n

Sunday 11am Harbor 3:
\nIs Science Addicted to Randomness?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Well, is it? If so, why? And when is “random” not so??<\/p>\n

Greg Bear (m), Jeff Hecht, Geoffrey A. Landis, Chad Orzel<\/p>\n

I’m not even sure what the title question means<\/strong>, so this ought to be interesting.<\/p>\n

Sunday 12noon Lewis:
\nGlobal Warming: Facts and Myths, (and all that jazz)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Last year the sea ice grew, reversing a trend. Global warming is proven, but how
\nbad can it be, really? And would it be so terrible to someday have no snow for
\nBoskone?<\/p>\n

Vince Docherty, James Morrow, Mark L. Olson, Chad Orzel (m)<\/p>\n

I’m still looking for ways to avoid the many pitfalls of this topic. If you know anything useful that might help keep this from being soul-crushing, please, leave a comment.<\/p>\n

Sunday 1pm Harbor 1:
\nDisease and Pestilence and Population<\/strong><\/p>\n

Most people are familiar with Thomas Malthus’ depressing theories: as population
\nincreases, food and other resources decrease, and the likelihood of disease
\nincreases, resulting in a population crash. How true are his theories today? Is
\npopulation increase inevitable? What about disease, in this age of medicine?<\/p>\n

Debra Doyle, Matthew Jarpe (m), Robert I. Katz, Jon Singer, Teresa Nielsen Hayden<\/p>\n

After back-to-back panels, I’m going to be looking for lunch. This is loaded with interesting people, though, so if you’re not in danger of faiting from hunger, it’s probably worth a look.<\/p>\n

Sunday 2pm Harbor 3:
\nSpace Propulsion: a Dialog<\/strong><\/p>\n

See just how many ways there are to leave the planet….and find out which ones
\nare feasible and\/or under development. (And why the other ones aren’t….yet?)<\/p>\n

Jordin T. Kare, Geoffrey A. Landis<\/p>\n

Actual Rocket Scientists speak.<\/p>\n

That’s pretty much it, at least based on my cursory examination of the program. I’m not saying I’ll definitely be at any panel other than the ones I’m on, but these are the things I’m most likely to attend while I’m there.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I usually post something here about what panels look interesting when the Boskone program goes up on the web. This year’s program went up over the weekend, and I’m just now getting around to making a list of worthwhile items. This tells you what kind of week I’m having. Anyway, I looked the program over… Continue reading Interesting Stuff at Boskone<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,15,37,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3408","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-music","category-pop_culture","category-sf","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3408","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3408"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3408\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3408"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3408"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3408"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}