{"id":3358,"date":"2009-01-28T10:24:04","date_gmt":"2009-01-28T10:24:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/28\/grading-methods-dont-matter\/"},"modified":"2009-01-28T10:24:04","modified_gmt":"2009-01-28T10:24:04","slug":"grading-methods-dont-matter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/28\/grading-methods-dont-matter\/","title":{"rendered":"Grading Methods Don&#8217;t Matter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Dot Physics, Rhett is <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.dotphys.net\/2009\/01\/grades-curve-or-no-curve\/\">pondering grading curves<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Should you grade on a curve or not? If you are student, the answer is clear: go by whatever the instructor does. Otherwise, you have a choice. I don&#8217;t like to tell other instructors or faculty what to do because I respect their freedom. For my classes, there is no curve. Why? Well, the question really is: &#8220;why grade on a curve?&#8221; I don&#8217;t know the exact reason for particular instructors, but I can come up with some possible reasons.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>My first few years teaching, I worried about this quite a bit. I talked to different faculty in the department about what they did, and to a few people in other departments. In my third year or so, though, I realized that it just didn&#8217;t matter.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The catalyst for this realization was a student who wasn&#8217;t happy with his grade. He&#8217;d been a decent student in the class, and I thought the grade I gave him was perfectly respectable, but he was hoping to go to med school, and thought he should&#8217;ve been a step higher.<\/p>\n<p>I was bothered by this, because he had been a good student, so I went back and recalculated his grade using every one of the methods other people had told me about, from explicit numerical &#8220;curves&#8221; to setting the mean for the course at a target letter grade, and going one letter up or down for each standard deviation away from that mean. And every one of them came back the same way.<\/p>\n<p>Since then, I&#8217;ve been much more casual about the way I assign letter grades. The relative weights of the different assignments are clearly set out in the syllabus, and I try to make the grading standards as clear as I can, but when the time comes to convert the numbers in the spreadsheet into letters for the Registrar, I just go with numerical values: 95% is an A, 85% is a B, 75% is a C, with pluses and minuses spaced roughly equally between those. I may shift the line between B+ and A- (or any other adjacent pair of grades) if I think a particular student deserves a higher grade than strict numerical cut-offs would indicate, but that&#8217;s a tiny effect.<\/p>\n<p>And as long as I&#8217;ve been doing my job well during the term, the grades fall out more or less where you would expect. There is always a student or two whose score is around 95%, to get an A, and the weakest students come in around the C\/D boundary. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve had anybody finish the course and earn an outright F&#8211; I&#8217;ve occasionally had to fail students because they failed to turn in labs (we have a policy that students must have a passing lab grade to pass the course, and that all lab reports must be handed in to get a passing lab grade), and I&#8217;ve had students who were headed for an F drop the class, but I don&#8217;t think anyone has been so dismal they didn&#8217;t deserve even a D.<\/p>\n<p>I think that&#8217;s really the key. If I&#8217;m doing my job, and properly matching the content of the tests to the content of the class, everything works out fine without needing to curve anything.<\/p>\n<p>When students ask, I do tend to say &#8220;The person with the highest total grade in the class will get an A,&#8221; which works remarkably well to reassure students who are hoping for a curve. I don&#8217;t tell them that that&#8217;s because there&#8217;s almost always somebody in the class who gets A grades on all the individual assignments, and not because I curve the grades to get there.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Dot Physics, Rhett is pondering grading curves: Should you grade on a curve or not? If you are student, the answer is clear: go by whatever the instructor does. Otherwise, you have a choice. I don&#8217;t like to tell other instructors or faculty what to do because I respect their freedom. For my&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2009\/01\/28\/grading-methods-dont-matter\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Grading Methods Don&#8217;t Matter<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academia","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3358\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}