{"id":2925,"date":"2008-09-13T15:18:50","date_gmt":"2008-09-13T15:18:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/09\/13\/a-longitudinal-study-of-bloggi\/"},"modified":"2008-09-13T15:18:50","modified_gmt":"2008-09-13T15:18:50","slug":"a-longitudinal-study-of-bloggi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2008\/09\/13\/a-longitudinal-study-of-bloggi\/","title":{"rendered":"A Longitudinal Study of Blogging Traffic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Back in March, I noted that I had inadvertently done an experiment to see <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/what_kind_of_blogging_brings_t.php\">what kinds of posts bring the most hits<\/a>. That week, I posted one peer-reviewed post every day, along with a bunch of other articles, and I looked at the traffic stats to back up my contention that hard-core science blogging is not what racks up the page views.<\/p>\n<p>The question came up again at the <a href=\"http:\/\/science21stcentury.org\/\">conference this past week<\/a>, which reminded me that at the time, some people argued that the science posts weren&#8217;t a big immediate draw, but would build up more posts over the long term. I thought it would be interesting to go back and look at the data in Analytics, and I generated the following table comparing page views from the week of March 9-15 to the page views from March 9 to September 12:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<td>URL<\/td>\n<td>Mar. Views<\/td>\n<td>Sept. Views<\/td>\n<td>Change<\/td>\n<td>Mar. Rank<\/td>\n<td>Sept. Rank<\/td>\n<td>Rank Change<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/talk_like_a_physicist.php\">Talk Like a Physicist<\/a><\/td>\n<td>1215<\/td>\n<td>4510<\/td>\n<td>3295<\/td>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/pimp_me_new_blogs_1.php\">Pimp Me New Blogs<\/a><\/td>\n<td>453<\/td>\n<td>524<\/td>\n<td>71<\/td>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td>-3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/a_users_guide_to_vacuum_pumps.php\">A User&#8217;s Guide to Vacuum Pumps<\/a><\/td>\n<td>432<\/td>\n<td>864<\/td>\n<td>432<\/td>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/tips_for_speakers.php\">Tips for Speakers<\/a><\/td>\n<td>333<\/td>\n<td>367<\/td>\n<td>34<\/td>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td>7<\/td>\n<td>-3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/a_users_guide_to_vacuum_pumps_1.php\">A User&#8217;s Guide to Vacuum Pumps (part 2)<\/a><\/td>\n<td>331<\/td>\n<td>523<\/td>\n<td>192<\/td>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<td>-1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/futurebaby_playlist_ab.php\">FutureBaby Playlist A-B<\/a><\/td>\n<td>317<\/td>\n<td>333<\/td>\n<td>16<\/td>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<td>8<\/td>\n<td>-2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/art_and_animals.php\">Art and Animals<\/a><\/td>\n<td>275<\/td>\n<td>276<\/td>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>7<\/td>\n<td>14<\/td>\n<td>-7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/lab_visit_report_biophysics.php\">Lab Visit Report: Biophysics<\/a><\/td>\n<td>258<\/td>\n<td>293<\/td>\n<td>35<\/td>\n<td>8<\/td>\n<td>12<\/td>\n<td>-4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/lab_visit_report_francium.php\">Lab Visit Report: Francium<\/a><\/td>\n<td>256<\/td>\n<td>730<\/td>\n<td>474<\/td>\n<td>9<\/td>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/post_3.php\">Lab Visit Report: Cavity QED<\/a><\/td>\n<td>251<\/td>\n<td>322<\/td>\n<td>71<\/td>\n<td>10<\/td>\n<td>9<\/td>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/lorentz_contracted_asteroids.php\">Lorentz Contracted Asteroids<\/a><\/td>\n<td>244<\/td>\n<td>258<\/td>\n<td>14<\/td>\n<td>11<\/td>\n<td>15<\/td>\n<td>-4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/nice_beaver.php\">Nice Beaver<\/a><\/td>\n<td>243<\/td>\n<td>879<\/td>\n<td>636<\/td>\n<td>12<\/td>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/lab_visit_report_cold_plasmas.php\">Lab Visit Report: Cold Plasmas<\/a><\/td>\n<td>236<\/td>\n<td>282<\/td>\n<td>46<\/td>\n<td>13<\/td>\n<td>13<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/headline_mismatch.php\">Headline Mismatch<\/a><\/td>\n<td>193<\/td>\n<td>198<\/td>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td>14<\/td>\n<td>17<\/td>\n<td>-3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/score_one_for_physics.php\">Score One for Physics<\/a><\/td>\n<td>184<\/td>\n<td>181<\/td>\n<td>-3<\/td>\n<td>15<\/td>\n<td>19<\/td>\n<td>-4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/lab_visit_report_fourwave_mixi.php\">Lab Visit Report: Four-Wave Mixing<\/a><\/td>\n<td>179<\/td>\n<td>305<\/td>\n<td>126<\/td>\n<td>16<\/td>\n<td>10<\/td>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/futurebaby_playlist_cg.php\">FutureBaby Playlist C-G<\/a><\/td>\n<td>174<\/td>\n<td>174<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>17<\/td>\n<td>20<\/td>\n<td>-3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/interstellar_economics.php\">Interstellar Economics<\/a><\/td>\n<td>169<\/td>\n<td>257<\/td>\n<td>88<\/td>\n<td>18<\/td>\n<td>16<\/td>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/imperturbable_ducks.php\">Imperturbable Ducks<\/a><\/td>\n<td>146<\/td>\n<td>297<\/td>\n<td>151<\/td>\n<td>19<\/td>\n<td>11<\/td>\n<td>8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/03\/slothinabox_1.php\">Sloth-in-a-Box<\/a><\/td>\n<td>139<\/td>\n<td>186<\/td>\n<td>47<\/td>\n<td>20<\/td>\n<td>18<\/td>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>So, what can we say about this?<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Well, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a mixed bag. There are science-related posts that saw big gains between March and September, but the proportion of science content in the top ten posts doesn&#8217;t change&#8211;in fact, the second most popular post over the full span is just a picture of a zoo animal with a movie-reference title. One research blogging post moved into the top ten, but it just replaced one post that fell out&#8211; the total number of serious science blogging posts in the top ten remains the same.<\/p>\n<p>It is true that if you just look at the top ten posts in terms of the change in the number of views, five of them are science-related (three research blogging posts and the two vacuum pump posts), but the other five are fluff of one sort or another.<\/p>\n<p>This is a small sample of posts, of course, and there are innumerable factors that can influence these things, but at the very least, I would stick to my original conclusion that serious, detailed blogging about science is not a significant driver of traffic for this blog.<\/p>\n<p>Which is not to say that science per se does badly&#8211; life-in-the-lab stuff does quite well, as shown by the performance of the vacuum pump posts. I have no intention of stopping that stuff, and as I said in Waterloo, I think it makes a useful contribution to the community. But it&#8217;s not what brings in the big bucks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Back in March, I noted that I had inadvertently done an experiment to see what kinds of posts bring the most hits. That week, I posted one peer-reviewed post every day, along with a bunch of other articles, and I looked at the traffic stats to back up my contention that hard-core science blogging is&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2008\/09\/13\/a-longitudinal-study-of-bloggi\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A Longitudinal Study of Blogging Traffic<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogs","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2925\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}