{"id":2746,"date":"2008-07-15T10:43:40","date_gmt":"2008-07-15T10:43:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/07\/15\/sizzle-no-such-thing-as-bad-pu\/"},"modified":"2008-07-15T10:43:40","modified_gmt":"2008-07-15T10:43:40","slug":"sizzle-no-such-thing-as-bad-pu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2008\/07\/15\/sizzle-no-such-thing-as-bad-pu\/","title":{"rendered":"Sizzle: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As you have no doubt noticed, my early-morning review of <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/07\/sizzle_a_global_warming_comedy.php\">Randy Olson&#8217;s <cite>Sizzle<\/cite><\/a> was part of a concerted effort to get blogs to review the movie all on the same day. It&#8217;s an experiment of sorts in using blogs to promote the movie.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately for Olson, it seems to be an experiment designed to test the old adage that &#8220;there&#8217;s no such thing as bad publicity, as long as they spell your name right.&#8221; Most of the blog reviews <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/sizzle.php\">collected at the ScienceBlogs page for the film<\/a> were, um, less than glowing. My own kind of &#8220;Meh.&#8221; review is one of the better ones on ScienceBlogs.<\/p>\n<p>Having looked at a whole bunch of these reviews, I have two meta-comments that I would like to make regarding the whole thing:<\/p>\n<p>1) I was genuinely surprised at how many people were confused about the format. Granted, I went in knowing it was a mockumentary (it says so on <a href=\"http:\/\/sizzlethemovie.com\/synopsis.php\">the promotional website<\/a>), but it seemed pretty obvious to me that it wasn&#8217;t all real. The only point where I had any doubts was in the sequence with Dr. Chilingarian, who was almost too perfectly goofy to be real. I thought it was perfectly clear which people were actors and which people were real.<\/p>\n<p>2) This isn&#8217;t really surprising to me, but I thought it was interesting that the most positive reviews came from non-scientists, while the scientists writing reviews were more negative (it&#8217;s not a perfect correlation&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/purepedantry\/2008\/07\/a_review_of_sizzle.php\">Jake Young<\/a> wrote the most positive review I&#8217;ve seen<\/a>). The most convenient pair to illustrate this is <a href=\"http:\/\/twistedphysics.typepad.com\/cocktail_party_physics\/2008\/07\/sizzle.html\">Jennifer Ouellette<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/cosmicvariance.com\/2008\/07\/15\/stories-of-sizzling-science\/\">Sean Carroll<\/a>&#8212; they both had doubts about the movie, but her review reads as much more favorable than his.<\/p>\n<p>As I said, this isn&#8217;t really a surprise to me. Most of the complaints from scientists were of the form &#8220;It needed more data,&#8221; which probably counts as missing the point in a way that illustrates the point. It was interesting to see, though.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As you have no doubt noticed, my early-morning review of Randy Olson&#8217;s Sizzle was part of a concerted effort to get blogs to review the movie all on the same day. It&#8217;s an experiment of sorts in using blogs to promote the movie. Unfortunately for Olson, it seems to be an experiment designed to test&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2008\/07\/15\/sizzle-no-such-thing-as-bad-pu\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Sizzle: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,5,13,48,33,35,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academia","category-blogs","category-education","category-environment","category-in_the_news","category-movies","category-science","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}