{"id":2010,"date":"2008-01-24T10:10:14","date_gmt":"2008-01-24T10:10:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2008\/01\/24\/dorky-poll-scientific-hopes\/"},"modified":"2008-01-24T10:10:14","modified_gmt":"2008-01-24T10:10:14","slug":"dorky-poll-scientific-hopes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2008\/01\/24\/dorky-poll-scientific-hopes\/","title":{"rendered":"Dorky Poll: Scientific Hopes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A little while ago, the Corporate Masters asked us to answer a couple of questions for possible inclusion in the first &#8217;08 issue of <cite>Seed<\/cite>. I originally posted this back in November, but got asked to take it down because the issue was hush-hush. The street date for the magazine in question was this week, though, and I busted up my wrist playing basketball yesterday, so I&#8217;m dragging it back out because typing hurts.<\/p>\n<p>The question is:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>What scientific development do you hope to be blogging or reading about in 2008?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The original question was more general, asking us just what we&#8217;d like to be blogging about in the coming year, but I restricted my answer (below the fold) to science stuff, and for the sake of general sanity, I&#8217;m going to restrict this post to scientific issues. I&#8217;ll put up a second post for political hopes.<\/p>\n<p>But for this post, what would you like to be blogging about (if you&#8217;re a blogger) or reading about (if you&#8217;re not a blogger) in the coming year? It could be a physics breakthrough, a math theorem, a new medical technique, or anything else in the realm of science. It should ideally be something that might plausibly happen in 2008, but that&#8217;s your call to make. It should also be brief, Jonathan Vos Post.<\/p>\n<p>My answer, from the world of physics:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>On a personal level, I&#8217;d like to be blogging about the upcoming release of my book. Or, better yet, the better-than-expected sales of my book&#8230; My deadline for handing the manuscript in is August 1, though, so unless I hand it in very early, I doubt that it&#8217;ll come out before early 2009. We&#8217;ll see, though.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of science, I&#8217;d like to be blogging about new and exciting results from the AMO\/ Quantum Optics physics community. There are a few experiments out there with the potential to do really exciting things in the near future, such as the molecule-based searches for an electric dipole moment (EDM) of the electron. These are table-top experiments that have the potential to rule out large classes of beyond-the-Standard-Model physics without using any multi-billion-dollar accelerators, and I think that&#8217;s extremely cool.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s also always a chance that somebody will make a dramatic step forward in the quantum computing\/ quantum information field. A demonstration of a real system (DWave&#8217;s thing doesn&#8217;t count) for running quantum algorithms with error correction using several<br \/>\nentangled qbits would be an amazing development, and I&#8217;d love to be spending time blogging about that.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Tomorrow: Fear!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A little while ago, the Corporate Masters asked us to answer a couple of questions for possible inclusion in the first &#8217;08 issue of Seed. I originally posted this back in November, but got asked to take it down because the issue was hush-hush. The street date for the magazine in question was this week,&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2008\/01\/24\/dorky-poll-scientific-hopes\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Dorky Poll: Scientific Hopes<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2010","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics","category-science","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2010","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2010"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2010\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2010"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}