{"id":176,"date":"2006-04-09T14:43:48","date_gmt":"2006-04-09T14:43:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/04\/09\/i-do-not-think-that-means-what\/"},"modified":"2006-04-09T14:43:48","modified_gmt":"2006-04-09T14:43:48","slug":"i-do-not-think-that-means-what","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/04\/09\/i-do-not-think-that-means-what\/","title":{"rendered":"I Do Not Think That Means What You Think It Means"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Bookslut, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bookslut.com\/specfic%20floozy.php\">Specfic Floozy<\/a> takes another look at the subgenre (or possibly sub-subgenre) of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bookslut.com\/specfic_floozy\/2006_03_008400.php\">&#8220;steampunk,&#8221;<\/a> which she defines thusly:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>For the uninitiated, steampunk, a term that is prominently tossed around in   the late &#8217;80s. is one of the many subgenres of cyberpunk (others &#8212; some more  tongue in cheek than others &#8212; are sandalpunk, bronzepunk and stonepunk). Nikola  Tesla and\/or Charles Babbage frequently pop-up as characters, as do set pieces  involving dirigibles, steam engines and, inexplicably, the Japanese. While the  idea of meshing Victorian-esque machinery with future societies had been floating  about long before the label was applied, it was William Gibson and Bruce Sterling\u2019s  <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/055329461X\/artandlies-20\">The Difference Engine<\/a><\/em> that was the watershed title that brought the term  into widespread use. Well, widespread is a relative term &#8212; but steampunk was suddenly the hot thing in discussions about speculative fiction.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I don&#8217;t really recall it being all that big a deal, but I wasn&#8217;t reading a lot of SF criticism in the late 80&#8217;s and early 90&#8217;s, so who knows. What I find particularly puzzling about the piece, though, is the set of books she chose to read  in the course of re-evaluating the genre: Christopher Priest&#8217;s <cite>The Prestige<\/cite> is arguably steampunk&#8211; it doesn&#8217;t really strike me as attitudinal enough to really fit as a historical-fiction offshoot of cyberpunk, but I don&#8217;t have any major objections to it.<\/p>\n<p>(Stranger choices below the fold&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>But <cite>The Anubis Gates<\/cite> by Tim Powers? That&#8217;s a fantasy novel, and not remotely punk. And while Neal Stephenson&#8217;s <cite>The Diamond Age<\/cite> certainly has its punk aspects, I don&#8217;t think nanotech-wielding Neo-Victorians in a future Hong Kong really count as &#8220;steampunk.&#8221; At a minimum, I would expect &#8220;steampunk&#8221; to involve, you know, steam&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>As I said, I wasn&#8217;t really plugged into the critical side of the genre back then, so I&#8217;m not sure how people defined things at the time, but these books don&#8217;t seem to me to have much of anything in common. I have a hard time imagining how you draw a sensible subgenre boundary that encompasses all three.<\/p>\n<p>Are these really all considered &#8220;steampunk&#8221; books?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Bookslut, the Specfic Floozy takes another look at the subgenre (or possibly sub-subgenre) of &#8220;steampunk,&#8221; which she defines thusly: For the uninitiated, steampunk, a term that is prominently tossed around in the late &#8217;80s. is one of the many subgenres of cyberpunk (others &#8212; some more tongue in cheek than others &#8212; are&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/04\/09\/i-do-not-think-that-means-what\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">I Do Not Think That Means What You Think It Means<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}