{"id":169,"date":"2006-04-07T09:22:53","date_gmt":"2006-04-07T09:22:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/04\/07\/greatest-science-book-1\/"},"modified":"2006-04-07T09:22:53","modified_gmt":"2006-04-07T09:22:53","slug":"greatest-science-book-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/04\/07\/greatest-science-book-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Greatest Science Book?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over at the <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/seed\/\">new Seed blog<\/a>, here on ScienceBlogs, Katherine Sharpe <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/seed\/2006\/04\/the_best_science_books_ever.php\">asks about the best science books ever<\/a> (a topic that was also <a href=\"http:\/\/cosmicvariance.com\/2005\/08\/24\/greatest-popular-science-book\/\">discussed at Cosmic Variance<\/a> some time back.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve been sort of swamped this week, but that&#8217;s only part of the reason why I haven&#8217;t responded. The main reason is a shameful secret:<\/p>\n<p>(Below the fold&#8230; Isn&#8217;t this suspenseful?)<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The fact is, I don&#8217;t read many pop-science books, and I never really have. I&#8217;m not sure why that was in the past, but these days, it just seems too much like work. Not &#8220;work&#8221; in the sense of being difficult, but &#8220;work&#8221; in the sense of &#8220;this is how I spend my days, and by God, I&#8217;m not reading about it in my free time.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I do dimly recall reading more non-fiction when I was a kid, but most of it was pretty much unexceptional. I just read whatever was in front of me, and don&#8217;t particularly remember much of it. More recently, I&#8217;ve occasionally read some of the Important non-fiction blockbusters&#8211; <cite>A Brief History of Time<\/cite>, <cite>Goedel, Escher, Bach<\/cite>, <cite>The Language Instinct<\/cite>, <cite>Guns, Germs, and Steel<\/cite>&#8212; but I don&#8217;t make a habit of it. I actually own a copy of <cite>The Elegant Universe<\/cite>, because I figured that if people are going to insist on asking me about the damn thing, I ought to at least give it a chance, but I have yet to crack the cover.<\/p>\n<p>I do usually try to read at least some of <cite>Physics Today<\/cite> (though I&#8217;m way behind on that), but really, the only science <strong>book<\/strong> that stands out from the last few years is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.steelypips.org\/library\/0503.html#052803\">Bill Bryson&#8217;s <cite>A Short History of Nearly Everything<\/cite><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the real origin of Katherine&#8217;s question is more an interest in what turned people on to science originally. So, you might think that would be a better topic to pursue.<\/p>\n<p>Sadly, I&#8217;m not much better there. I can cite a few tv shows that were vaguely inspiring&#8211; <cite>Cosmos<\/cite> and <cite>Connections<\/cite> come to mind&#8211; but I literally don&#8217;t remember a time when I wasn&#8217;t interested in science, and planning to become a scientist someday.<\/p>\n<p>What <strong>kind<\/strong> of scientist I planned to become has changed a lot over the years&#8211; I went through the obligatory dinosaur-crazy phase where I wanted to be a paleontologist, I wanted to be a marine biologist for a while (I think that&#8217;s what I said in the cute story my parents tell about me boggling my kindergarten teacher), I was interested in archaeology for a while, and chemistry, and astronomy, and so on. I still find most of them fascinating subjects, and often regret <strong>not<\/strong> being a marine biologist on days when I find myself spending a glorious sunny summer day working in a windowless room in a damp basement&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>In the end, though, I was pretty much always interested in science, in one form or another. I ended up in physics because of my high-school physics class (which I took as a junior, for complicated reasons), and ultimately because quantum mechanics is just the coolest theory in the history of theories.<\/p>\n<p>How did I know that, if I didn&#8217;t read great pop-science books? That one, I can answer: science fiction. That&#8217;s another thing that I&#8217;ve been into almost as long as I can remember&#8211; I&#8217;ve always read a lot of SF (though again, I wasn&#8217;t terribly discriminating as a youngster, and would read pretty much anything involving words in a row), and I first encountered all sorts of strange ideas in the context of SF stories.<\/p>\n<p>So, if you&#8217;re looking for <strong>the<\/strong> book that really got me started, you&#8217;re probably after the earliest science fiction book I can remember reading. And that one, I can actually answer (well, there was a book with pictures in it, involved slightly lumpy aliens who lived in tunnels underground, the title of which I can&#8217;t begin to remember, but which I think I got out of the kids&#8217; room at the library about a dozen times): the first SF novel that I can definitely remember reading and enjoying as SF was <cite>Red Planet<\/cite> by Robert Heinlein.<\/p>\n<p>So, there you go Katherine. Sorry I wasn&#8217;t more helpful. But while I&#8217;m writing in this vein, I might as well tell a wasn&#8217;t-I-precocious anecdote, in another post.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at the new Seed blog, here on ScienceBlogs, Katherine Sharpe asks about the best science books ever (a topic that was also discussed at Cosmic Variance some time back. I&#8217;ve been sort of swamped this week, but that&#8217;s only part of the reason why I haven&#8217;t responded. The main reason is a shameful secret:&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2006\/04\/07\/greatest-science-book-1\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Greatest Science Book?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,18,2,11,29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogs","category-books","category-personal","category-science","category-sf","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/169\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}