{"id":1106,"date":"2007-02-09T09:56:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-09T09:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2007\/02\/09\/international-hypothetical-col-1\/"},"modified":"2007-02-09T09:56:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-09T09:56:00","slug":"international-hypothetical-col-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2007\/02\/09\/international-hypothetical-col-1\/","title":{"rendered":"International Hypothetical Collider"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The big story in high-energy physics this week is the release of a report on the projected cost of the International (<a href=\"http:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/?p=1435\">very nearly<\/a>) Linear Collider (ILC), which comes out to $6.7 billion-with-a-b (not including labor). There&#8217;s a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/02\/09\/science\/space\/09collider.html?ex=1328677200&#038;en=4776d5e0237de622&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss\">story in the <cite>Times<\/cite> this morning<\/a>, and an <a href=\"http:\/\/cosmicvariance.com\/2007\/02\/08\/designing-the-next-big-machine\/\">expert view on Cosmic Variance<\/a>, and&#8230; well, if you read physics blogs, you&#8217;ve seen it mentioned. They&#8217;d revoke my blogging license if I failed to say anything about it.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just cranky at the end of a long week, but I have a hard time getting all that excited about this. For one thing, it&#8217;s not my area of physics. More importantly, though, it&#8217;s still a hugely speculative endeavor, contingent on a lot of other factors.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The short explanation is that the ILC is proposed as a follow-up machine for the Large Hadron Collider, the new machine at CERN that is projected to start up late this year and has everybody in particle physics all a-twitter. The ILC won&#8217;t reach the same maximum energies as the LHC, but it will provide a little more control over the collision energy, and is thus envisioned as a way to &#8220;zoom in&#8221; and really nail down the properties of new particles discovered at the LHC.<\/p>\n<p>Which is the &#8220;contingent&#8221; part. It&#8217;s only interesting to build the machine if something new gets found at the LHC in the energy range of interest, which we won&#8217;t know for at least a couple of years. It&#8217;s a pretty solid expectation, but by no means certain. If the LHC doesn&#8217;t find anything, the ILC won&#8217;t, either, so the most optimistic projections don&#8217;t have construction starting before 2010 or so. And that assumes that something interesting is found, <strong>and<\/strong> they manage to get the various governments involved to pay for the thing.<\/p>\n<p>(The long explanation is <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/principles\/2006\/10\/thoughts_on_the_lhc_and_ilc.php\">here<\/a>&#8230;)<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8211; I&#8217;m not saying that the planning effort is a waste of time&#8211; if the device is going to be built in the lifetime of anybody working in high-energy physics now, the planning needs to be done in parallel with the LHC development. I&#8217;m just saying that I&#8217;m not particularly excited about the announcement that a machine that <strong>may<\/strong> get built <strong>if<\/strong> the LHC finds something <strong>and<\/strong> the funding can be secured will cost shitloads of money. I understand that it&#8217;s been a slow news decade for particle physics, but this just doesn&#8217;t fill me with glee.<\/p>\n<p>But, as I said, it&#8217;s been a long week, and I&#8217;m a little cranky.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The big story in high-energy physics this week is the release of a report on the projected cost of the International (very nearly) Linear Collider (ILC), which comes out to $6.7 billion-with-a-b (not including labor). There&#8217;s a story in the Times this morning, and an expert view on Cosmic Variance, and&#8230; well, if you read&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/2007\/02\/09\/international-hypothetical-col-1\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">International Hypothetical Collider<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1106","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-funding","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1106","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1106"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1106\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1106"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1106"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/chadorzel.com\/principles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1106"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}